From: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 23:09:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bcb2d3d-8b8b-8a8f-1285-7277394b4e6b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bf69eef-7444-1238-0f4a-fb0fccda080c@blackwall.org>
On ???/??/???? ??:??, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 24/04/2022 22:49, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>> On ???/??/???? ??:??, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2022 15:09, Alaa Mohamed wrote:
>>>> Add extack support to .ndo_fdb_del in netdevice.h and
>>>> all related methods.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> changes in V3:
>>>> ???????? fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>>>> ---
>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c??????? | 4 ++--
>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c?????????? | 4 ++--
>>>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c | 2 +-
>>>> ? drivers/net/macvlan.c??????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>> ? drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c?????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>> ? include/linux/netdevice.h??????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>> ? net/bridge/br_fdb.c????????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>> ? net/bridge/br_private.h????????????????????????? | 2 +-
>>>> ? net/core/rtnetlink.c???????????????????????????? | 4 ++--
>>>> ? 9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>> index d768925785ca..7b55d8d94803 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>>>> @@ -5678,10 +5678,10 @@ ice_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr __always_unused *tb[],
>>>> ? static int
>>>> ? ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr,
>>>> -??????? __always_unused u16 vid)
>>>> +??????? __always_unused u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? int err;
>>>> -
>>>> +
>>> What's changed here?
>> In the previous version, I removed the blank line after "int err;" and you said I shouldn't so I added blank line.
>>
> Yeah, my question is are you fixing a dos ending or something else?
> The blank line is already there, what's wrong with it?
No, I didn't.
>
> The point is it's not nice to mix style fixes and other changes, more so
> if nothing is mentioned in the commit message.
Got it, So, what should I do to fix it?
>>>> ????? if (ndm->ndm_state & NUD_PERMANENT) {
>>>> ????????? netdev_err(dev, "FDB only supports static addresses\n");
>>>> ????????? return -EINVAL;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>> index 247bc105bdd2..e07c64e3159c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
>>>> @@ -774,14 +774,14 @@ static int ocelot_port_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>
>>>> ? static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ???????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> -?????????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>> +?????????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>> ????? struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
>>>> ????? struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
>>>> ????? int port = priv->chip_port;
>>>>
>>>> -??? return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid, ocelot_port->bridge);
>>>> +??? return ocelot_fdb_del(ocelot, port, addr, vid, ocelot_port->bridge, extack);
>>>> ? }
>>>>
>>>> ? static int ocelot_port_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>> index d320567b2cca..51fa23418f6a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_main.c
>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int qlcnic_set_mac(struct net_device *netdev, void *p)
>>>>
>>>> ? static int qlcnic_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ????????????? struct net_device *netdev,
>>>> -??????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>> +??????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? struct qlcnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>> ????? int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>> index 069e8824c264..ffd34d9f7049 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int macvlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>>
>>>> ? static int macvlan_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ???????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> -?????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>> +?????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>> ????? int err = -EINVAL;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>> index de97ff98d36e..cf2f60037340 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
>>>> @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ int __vxlan_fdb_delete(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>>>> ? /* Delete entry (via netlink) */
>>>> ? static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> -??????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>> +??????????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>> ????? union vxlan_addr ip;
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> index 28ea4f8269d4..d0d2a8f33c73 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> @@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>>> ???????????????????????????? struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ???????????????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> ???????????????????????????? const unsigned char *addr,
>>>> -?????????????????????????? u16 vid);
>>>> +?????????????????????????? u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>> ????? int??????????? (*ndo_fdb_dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> ????????????????????????? struct netlink_callback *cb,
>>>> ????????????????????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>> index 6ccda68bd473..5bfce2e9a553 100644
>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
>>>> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge *br,
>>>> ? /* Remove neighbor entry with RTM_DELNEIGH */
>>>> ? int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> ??????????? struct net_device *dev,
>>>> -????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
>>>> +????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>>> ? {
>>>> ????? struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
>>>> ????? struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
>>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>> index 18ccc3d5d296..95348c1c9ce5 100644
>>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
>>>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *source,
>>>> ???????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, unsigned long flags);
>>>>
>>>> ? int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>> -????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid);
>>>> +????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>> This is way too long (111 chars) and checkpatch should've complained about it.
>>> WARNING: line length of 111 exceeds 100 columns
>>> #234: FILE: net/bridge/br_private.h:782:
>>> +????????? struct net_device *dev, const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> I will fix it.
>>
>>>> ? int br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *nlh, struct nlattr *tb[], struct net_device *dev,
>>>> ???????????? const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, u16 nlh_flags,
>>>> ???????????? struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>> index 4041b3e2e8ec..99b30ae58a47 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>>> @@ -4223,7 +4223,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>> ????????? const struct net_device_ops *ops = br_dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>
>>>> ????????? if (ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>> -??????????? err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>> +??????????? err = ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid, extack);
>>>>
>>>> ????????? if (err)
>>>> ????????????? goto out;
>>>> @@ -4235,7 +4235,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>>> ????? if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_SELF) {
>>>> ????????? if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del)
>>>> ????????????? err = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr,
>>>> -?????????????????????????????? vid);
>>>> +?????????????????????????????? vid, extack);
>>>> ????????? else
>>>> ????????????? err = ndo_dflt_fdb_del(ndm, tb, dev, addr, vid);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.36.0
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-24 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-24 12:09 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] propagate extack to vxlan_fdb_delete Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] rtnetlink: add extack support in fdb del handlers Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:49 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:55 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 21:09 ` Alaa Mohamed [this message]
2022-04-24 21:52 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-25 11:47 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 6:11 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-25 11:51 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-25 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: vxlan: vxlan_core.c: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 16:15 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:52 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 18:56 ` Julia Lawall
2022-04-24 18:59 ` Alaa Mohamed
2022-04-24 19:03 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-24 19:20 ` Alaa Mohamed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bcb2d3d-8b8b-8a8f-1285-7277394b4e6b@gmail.com \
--to=eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox