public inbox for intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Li Li <boolli@google.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<kuba@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <decot@google.com>,
	 <anjali.singhai@intel.com>, <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	<brianvv@google.com>, <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: do not perform flow ops when netdev is detached
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:46:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c2b3c63-4668-498e-9c4a-a135da5cd5b3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODvEq4R_7SXfo5QJ0z=fM5npz1ZFFcCQTTKkdoLKtXyoDnjRA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/30/2026 1:58 PM, Li Li wrote:
> Yes, OpenOnload calls idpf_set_rxnfc directly without checking if the
> netdev is detached first. I've discussed this with the team
> internally, and we decided to fix OpenOnload directly, rather than
> adding the check in idpf.
> 
> Please feel free to drop this patch, thank you!

I've dropped the patch from Intel Wired LAN patchworks. Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-30 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  5:16 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: do not perform flow ops when netdev is detached Li Li via Intel-wired-lan
2026-04-23 16:33 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-23 18:40   ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-30 20:58     ` Li Li via Intel-wired-lan
2026-04-30 22:46       ` Jacob Keller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c2b3c63-4668-498e-9c4a-a135da5cd5b3@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=anjali.singhai@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=boolli@google.com \
    --cc=brianvv@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decot@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox