[Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH] ixgbe: add new bus type for intergrated I/O interface (IOSF)

[Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>]

On 06/18/2015 12:50 PM, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.h.duyck at redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:45 PM
>> To: Skidmore, Donald C; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH] ixgbe: add new bus type for
>> intergrated I/O interface (IOSF)
>>
>> On 06/18/2015 10:24 AM, Donald C Skidmore wrote:
>>> With this patch we add support for a new bus type
>> ixgbe_bus_type_internal.
>>> X550em devices use IOSF and not PCIe bus so this new type is to
>>> accommodate them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Donald C Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |    1 +
>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c |    1 +
>>>    3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> index 5f1b06a..dd53abd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> @@ -246,11 +246,19 @@ static inline bool ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(struct
>> ixgbe_hw *hw)
>>>    static void ixgbe_check_minimum_link(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>>>    				     int expected_gts)
>>>    {
>>> +	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>>>    	int max_gts = 0;
>>>    	enum pci_bus_speed speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>>>    	enum pcie_link_width width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN;
>>>    	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>>
>>> +	/* Some devices are not connected over PCIe and thus do not
>> negotiate
>>> +	 * speed. These devices do not have valid bus info, and thus any
>> report
>>> +	 * we generate may not be correct.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (hw->bus.type == ixgbe_bus_type_internal)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>>    	/* determine whether to use the parent device */
>>>    	if (ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(&adapter->hw))
>>>    		pdev = adapter->pdev->bus->parent->self; @@ -8844,9
>> +8852,10 @@
>>> skip_sriov:
>>>    	hw->eeprom.ops.read(hw, 0x2d, &adapter->eeprom_verl);
>>>
>>>    	/* pick up the PCI bus settings for reporting later */
>>> -	hw->mac.ops.get_bus_info(hw);
>>>    	if (ixgbe_pcie_from_parent(hw))
>>>    		ixgbe_get_parent_bus_info(adapter);
>>> +	else
>>> +		 hw->mac.ops.get_bus_info(hw);
>>>
>>>    	/* calculate the expected PCIe bandwidth required for optimal
>>>    	 * performance. Note that some older parts will never have enough
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> index 19271e5..37df15f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h
>>> @@ -3067,6 +3067,7 @@ enum ixgbe_bus_type {
>>>    	ixgbe_bus_type_pci,
>>>    	ixgbe_bus_type_pcix,
>>>    	ixgbe_bus_type_pci_express,
>>> +	ixgbe_bus_type_internal,
>>>    	ixgbe_bus_type_reserved
>>>    };
>>>
>> Are there really any parts that are listed as using a pci or pcix type?
>> If not you could probably drop those types from the enum since they don't
>> add any value.
> I really like that idea. :)  Still wouldn't that be worth of its own patch, even though it would be really small patch?
>
> Thanks,
> -Don

Yeah, probably doesn't need to block this one, but is something that 
should probably be done as a clean-up eventually.

- Alex