* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
@ 2015-09-17 12:46 Stefan Assmann
2015-10-20 15:24 ` Don Buchholz
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] " Laine Stump
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2015-09-17 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
igb_init_queue_configuration()
igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
igb_probe_vfs()
to
igb_probe_vfs()
igb_init_queue_configuration()
igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
crash on accessing the structure).
[ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048
[ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
[ 7.419370] PGD 0
[ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
[ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
[ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
[ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS 1.6.0 03/07/2013
[...]
[ 7.419431] Call Trace:
[ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
[ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
+ /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
+ adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
+
igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2015-09-17 12:46 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization Stefan Assmann
@ 2015-10-20 15:24 ` Don Buchholz
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] " Laine Stump
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Don Buchholz @ 2015-10-20 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
On 09/17/15 05:46, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
> igb_probe_vfs()
> to
> igb_probe_vfs()
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>
> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
> crash on accessing the structure).
>
> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048
> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS 1.6.0 03/07/2013
> [...]
> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>
> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
> +
> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>
> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
>
Tested-by: Don Buchholz <donald.buchholz@intel.com>
Verfied - patch fixes problem.
First, issue was re-created with unpatched kernel. On test system, the
file /etc/modprobe.d/igb.conf contains "options igb max_vfs=4 debug=16".
The unpatched kernel behaved poorly in two manners: (1) During system
boot, 'igb' driver would load with no panic or stack trace, but no VFs
were created. (2) When the module was removed (rmmod igb) and then
reloaded (modprobe igb) the "null pointer dereference / Oops" occurs and
stack trace is generated.
Applied patch and verified 'igb' now loads as expected (VFs are created
at boot time and no "Oops" occurs.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2015-09-17 12:46 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization Stefan Assmann
2015-10-20 15:24 ` Don Buchholz
@ 2016-02-05 21:24 ` Laine Stump
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Laine Stump @ 2016-02-05 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Stefan,
I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
interim that were also part of the fix).
Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
would it be possible for you to do that?
Thanks!
The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
> igb_probe_vfs()
> to
> igb_probe_vfs()
> igb_init_queue_configuration()
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>
> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
> crash on accessing the structure).
>
> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048
> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS 1.6.0 03/07/2013
> [...]
> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>
> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
> +
> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>
> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] " Laine Stump
@ 2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2016-02-05 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
On 02/05/2016 10:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
> successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
> does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
> this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
> to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
> interim that were also part of the fix).
>
> Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
> would it be possible for you to do that?
>
> Thanks!
Hi Laine,
I took a quick look at 4.3 and the patch you mention should be
sufficient. For 4.2 I'll have to take a closer look. I'm currently
traveling but going to get back to you early next week.
I'd like double check things before taking any action.
Thanks!
Stefan
> The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
>
>
> On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>> igb_probe_vfs()
>> to
>> igb_probe_vfs()
>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>
>> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
>> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
>> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
>> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
>> crash on accessing the structure).
>>
>> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>> at 0000000000000048
>> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
>> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
>> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan
>> ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
>> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
>> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS
>> 1.6.0 03/07/2013
>> [...]
>> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
>> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
>> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>>
>> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
>> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>
>> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
>> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
>> +
>> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>>
>> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
@ 2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Assmann @ 2016-02-10 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
On 06.02.2016 00:13, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 10:24 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> I have an AMD 990FX system with an Intel 82576 card that could not
>> successfully boot with any kernel starting somewhere prior to 4.2, but
>> does boot properly in 4.4+. After a lot of time bisecting, I found that
>> this patch, when applied to kernel 4.3.0, solves the problem (applying
>> to 4.2.0 has no effect, so there's some other patch/patches in the
>> interim that were also part of the fix).
>>
>> Since I don't know the details of proposing this patch for 4.3 stable,
>> would it be possible for you to do that?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi Laine,
>
> I took a quick look at 4.3 and the patch you mention should be
> sufficient. For 4.2 I'll have to take a closer look. I'm currently
> traveling but going to get back to you early next week.
>
> I'd like double check things before taking any action.
I've tried to reproduce your issue on several systems, mostly Intel
though, without success running 4.2 or 4.3. As I know you mostly care
for 4.3 (current fedora) I'd suggest to queue commit
cbfe360a1541a32e9e28f8f8ac925d2b7979d767 igb: assume MSI-X interrupts
during initialization
to 4.3-stable as it's a follow-up fix to
ceee3450b3a85db05a107d54fbea031c77d30401 igb: make sure SR-IOV init uses
the right number of queues
Dave, if you agree with that please queue the patch for 4.3-stable.
Thanks!
Stefan
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stefan
>
>> The full saga of my problem and investigaton is here:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg10687.html
>>
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 08:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>>> In igb_sw_init() the sequence of calls was changed from
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>> igb_probe_vfs()
>>> to
>>> igb_probe_vfs()
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration()
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
>>>
>>> This results in adapter->flags not having the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit set
>>> during igb_probe_vfs()->igb_enable_sriov(). Therefore SR-IOV does not
>>> get enabled properly and we run into a NULL pointer if the max_vfs
>>> module parameter is specified (adapter->vf_data does not get allocated,
>>> crash on accessing the structure).
>>>
>>> [ 7.419348] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>>> at 0000000000000048
>>> [ 7.419367] IP: [<ffffffffa02161c6>] igb_reset+0xe6/0x5d0 [igb]
>>> [ 7.419370] PGD 0
>>> [ 7.419373] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>>> [ 7.419381] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci igb(+) i40e(+) vxlan
>>> ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel megaraid_sas(+) ixgbe(+) mdio
>>> [ 7.419385] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.2.0+ #153
>>> [ 7.419387] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0C4Y3R, BIOS
>>> 1.6.0 03/07/2013
>>> [...]
>>> [ 7.419431] Call Trace:
>>> [ 7.419442] [<ffffffffa0217236>] igb_probe+0x8b6/0x1340 [igb]
>>> [ 7.419447] [<ffffffff814c7f15>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
>>>
>>> Prevent this by setting the IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX bit before calling
>>> igb_probe_vfs(). The real interrupt capabilities will be checked during
>>> igb_init_interrupt_scheme() so this is safe to do.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> index e174fbb..ba019fc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>> @@ -2986,6 +2986,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>>> }
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>
>>> + /* Assume MSI-X interrupts, will be checked during IRQ allocation */
>>> + adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX;
>>> +
>>> igb_probe_vfs(adapter);
>>>
>>> igb_init_queue_configuration(adapter);
>>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-10 10:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-17 12:46 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] igb: assume MSI-X interrupts during initialization Stefan Assmann
2015-10-20 15:24 ` Don Buchholz
2016-02-05 21:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next] " Laine Stump
2016-02-05 23:13 ` Stefan Assmann
2016-02-10 10:26 ` Stefan Assmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).