Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3] e1000e: Reconfigure PLL clock gate timeout and re-enable K1 on Meteor Lake
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 13:13:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56f5f3da-31b8-4847-b274-ce140bf39617@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b60a7ab8-dbab-4684-abf4-4dd2a9024f8d@leemhuis.info>

On 5/6/2026 2:59 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 4/17/26 12:43, Dima Ruinskiy wrote:
>> Commit 3c7bf5af21960 ("e1000e: Introduce private flag to disable K1")
>> disabled K1 by default on Meteor Lake and newer systems due to packet
>> loss observed on various platforms. However, disabling K1 caused an
>> increase in power consumption.
>>
>> To mitigate this, reconfigure the PLL clock gate value so that K1 can
>> remain enabled without incurring the additional power consumption.
>> Re-enable K1 by default, but keep the private flag to support disabling
>> it via ethtool. Additionally, introduce a DMI quirk table, so that K1 may
>> be disabled by default on known problematic systems. Currently, this
>> includes the Dell Pro 16 Plus, where the issue has been reported to persist
>> despite the changes to the PLL lock timeout.
>>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220954
>> Link: https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20250623/048860.html
>> Link: https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20260330/054059.html
> 
> What happened to this fix for a regression first reported in January? It
> looks like it fell through the cracks. Or was some other solution found?
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten
> 
There has been a bunch of back and forth discussion and varying versions
of a fix for this. Its still in the Intel Wired LAN queue, and is
currently waiting for one the E1000E team to report testing completed.

Thanks,
Jake

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-17 10:43 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v3] e1000e: Reconfigure PLL clock gate timeout and re-enable K1 on Meteor Lake Dima Ruinskiy
2026-05-06  9:59 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-05-06 20:13   ` Jacob Keller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56f5f3da-31b8-4847-b274-ce140bf39617@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox