From: "naamax.meir" <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>,
kurt@linutronix.de, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 1/4] igc: Fix race condition in PTP tx code
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:29:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65172955-e051-e76e-26a6-ff5e895992e5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607213232.875138-2-vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
On 6/8/2023 00:32, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Currently, the igc driver supports timestamping only one tx packet at a
> time. During the transmission flow, the skb that requires hardware
> timestamping is saved in adapter->ptp_tx_skb. Once hardware has the
> timestamp, an interrupt is delivered, and adapter->ptp_tx_work is
> scheduled. In igc_ptp_tx_work(), we read the timestamp register, update
> adapter->ptp_tx_skb, and notify the network stack.
>
> While the thread executing the transmission flow (the user process
> running in kernel mode) and the thread executing ptp_tx_work don't
> access adapter->ptp_tx_skb concurrently, there are two other places
> where adapter->ptp_tx_skb is accessed: igc_ptp_tx_hang() and
> igc_ptp_suspend().
>
> igc_ptp_tx_hang() is executed by the adapter->watchdog_task worker
> thread which runs periodically so it is possible we have two threads
> accessing ptp_tx_skb at the same time. Consider the following scenario:
> right after __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS is set in igc_xmit_frame_ring(),
> igc_ptp_tx_hang() is executed. Since adapter->ptp_tx_start hasn't been
> written yet, this is considered a timeout and adapter->ptp_tx_skb is
> cleaned up.
>
> This patch fixes the issue described above by adding the ptp_tx_lock to
> protect access to ptp_tx_skb and ptp_tx_start fields from igc_adapter.
> Since igc_xmit_frame_ring() called in atomic context by the networking
> stack, ptp_tx_lock is defined as a spinlock, and the irq safe variants
> of lock/unlock are used.
>
> With the introduction of the ptp_tx_lock, the __IGC_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS
> flag doesn't provide much of a use anymore so this patch gets rid of it.
>
> Fixes: 2c344ae24501 ("igc: Add support for TX timestamping")
> Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 5 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 9 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c | 61 ++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-19 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 21:32 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 0/4] igc: TX timestamping fixes Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-07 21:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 1/4] igc: Fix race condition in PTP tx code Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-19 7:29 ` naamax.meir [this message]
2023-06-07 21:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 2/4] igc: Check if hardware TX timestamping is enabled earlier Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-20 6:54 ` naamax.meir
2023-06-07 21:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 3/4] igc: Retrieve TX timestamp during interrupt handling Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-20 19:02 ` naamax.meir
2023-06-07 21:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v4 4/4] igc: Work around HW bug causing missing timestamps Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-06-22 8:59 ` naamax.meir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65172955-e051-e76e-26a6-ff5e895992e5@linux.intel.com \
--to=naamax.meir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andre.guedes@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox