From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 4/5] igc: Retrieve TX timestamp during interrupt handling
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 11:51:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ctnumve.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504235233.1850428-5-vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]
On Thu May 04 2023, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> When the interrupt is handled, the TXTT_0 bit in the TSYNCTXCTL
> register should already be set and the timestamp value already loaded
> in the appropriate register.
>
> This simplifies the handling, and reduces the latency for retrieving
> the TX timestamp, which increase the amount of TX timestamps that can
> be handled in a given time period.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 162 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-05 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-04 23:52 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 0/5] igc: TX timestamping fixes Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-04 23:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 1/5] igc: Fix marking some timestamps as skipped wrongly Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-05 9:49 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-05-04 23:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 2/5] igc: Fix race condition in PTP tx code Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-05 9:51 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-05-04 23:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 3/5] igc: Fix checking for tstamp timeouts TX tstamp is off Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-05 9:51 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-05-04 23:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 4/5] igc: Retrieve TX timestamp during interrupt handling Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-05 9:51 ` Kurt Kanzenbach [this message]
2023-05-04 23:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 5/5] igc: Add workaround for missing timestamps Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-08 20:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl v1 0/5] igc: TX timestamping fixes Tony Nguyen
2023-05-08 22:18 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-05-09 17:23 ` Tony Nguyen
2023-05-09 20:51 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ctnumve.fsf@kurt \
--to=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox