From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 23:48:43 +0200 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints In-Reply-To: References: <20210504092340.00006c61@intel.com> <87pmxpdr32.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87im3gewlu.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87zgwo9u79.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnrs9tvp.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Message-ID: <87bl93ahc4.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Fri, May 21 2021 at 12:13, Nitesh Lal wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:03 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Provide new interfaces: >> >> irq_update_affinity_hint() - Only sets the affinity hint pointer >> irq_apply_affinity_hint() - Set the pointer and apply the affinity to >> the interrupt >> > > Any reason why you ruled out the usage of irq_set_affinity_and_hint()? > IMHO the latter makes it very clear what the function is meant to do. You're right. I was trying to phase the existing hint setter out, but that's probably pointless overengineering for no real value. Let me redo that. Thanks, tglx