Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/5] igc: Let the PCI core deal with the PM resume flow

[Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>]

Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 10:58:37AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:10:41PM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> > Currently igc driver calls pci_set_power_state() and pci_restore_state()
>> > and the like to bring the device back from low power states. However,
>> > PCI core handles all this on behalf of the driver. Furthermore with PTM
>> > enabled the PCI core re-enables it on resume but the driver calls
>> > pci_restore_state() which ends up disabling it again.
>> > 
>> > For this reason let the PCI core handle the common PM resume flow.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
>> 
>> I love it, thanks a lot for doing this!
>> 
>> Do we still need the pci_enable_device_mem() and pci_set_master()
>> in __igc_resume()?
>>
>> I suppose some of that is related to the pci_disable_device() in the
>> suspend path (__igc_shutdown()), but there are only a few dozen
>> drivers that do this, so I'm not sure it's essential.
>
> I think they are just as you describe due the fact there are explicit
> pci_disable_device() calls. Probably we can get rid of them as well but
> that requires careful testing that nothing accidentally breaks.
>

This series is solving real problems (thank you btw), I think the
pci_disable_device() one would be better as a separate series.


Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius