From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toke =?unknown-8bit?q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:04:30 +0100 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] New netdev feature flags for XDP In-Reply-To: <20201204112259.7f769952@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> References: <20201204102901.109709-1-marekx.majtyka@intel.com> <20201204092012.720b53bf@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <87k0tx7aa5.fsf@toke.dk> <20201204112259.7f769952@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Message-ID: <87tusx6cvl.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:26:10 +0100 Toke H?iland-J?rgensen wrote: >> Jakub Kicinski writes: >> >> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:28:56 +0100 alardam at gmail.com wrote: >> >> * Extend ethtool netlink interface in order to get access to the XDP >> >> bitmap (XDP_PROPERTIES_GET). [Toke] >> > >> > That's a good direction, but I don't see why XDP caps belong in ethtool >> > at all? We use rtnetlink to manage the progs... >> >> You normally use ethtool to get all the other features a device support, >> don't you? > > Not really, please take a look at all the IFLA attributes. There's > a bunch of capabilities there. Ah, right, TIL. Well, putting this new property in rtnetlink instead of ethtool is fine by me as well :) -Toke