From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neftin, Sasha Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:36:18 +0200 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM In-Reply-To: References: <20201214153450.874339-1-mario.limonciello@dell.com> <80862f70-18a4-4f96-1b96-e2fad7cc2b35@redhat.com> <18c1c152-9298-a4c5-c4ed-92c9fd91ea8a@intel.com> Message-ID: <9bac261e-0efb-fe07-7c3e-6c4ff156bb67@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On 12/15/2020 19:20, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > >>> Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again. >>> >> we need to explain why on Windows systems required 1s and on Linux >> systems up to 2.5s - otherwise it is not reliable approach - you will >> encounter others buggy system. >> (ME not POR on the Linux systems - is only one possible answer) > > Sasha: In your opinion does this information need to block the series? > or can we follow up with more changes later on as more information becomes > available? > I do not think this should block the patches series. > For now v5 of the series extends the timeout but at least makes a mention > that there appears to be a firmware bug when more than 1 second is taken. >