From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 5/6] igb: Do not free q_vector unless new one was allocated
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:45:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2lEK4CMdCyEMBLf@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR11MB1324FDF4D4399A6A99727B5EC13C9@DM5PR11MB1324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:55:58PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> >Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 2:03 AM
> >To: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> >Cc: davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com;
> >edumazet@google.com; Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>;
> >netdev@vger.kernel.org; Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>;
> >intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>;
> >Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; G, GurucharanX
> ><gurucharanx.g@intel.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] igb: Do not free q_vector unless new one
> >was allocated
> >
> >On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:54:13PM -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> >> From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> Avoid potential use-after-free condition under memory pressure. If the
> >> kzalloc() fails, q_vector will be freed but left in the original
> >> adapter->q_vector[v_idx] array position.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> >> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> >> Tested-by: Gurucharan <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker
> >at Intel)
> >
> >You should use first and last names here.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> >b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> >> index d6c1c2e66f26..c2bb658198bf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> >> @@ -1202,8 +1202,12 @@ static int igb_alloc_q_vector(struct igb_adapter
> >*adapter,
> >> if (!q_vector) {
> >> q_vector = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> } else if (size > ksize(q_vector)) {
> >> - kfree_rcu(q_vector, rcu);
> >> - q_vector = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + struct igb_q_vector *new_q_vector;
> >> +
> >> + new_q_vector = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (new_q_vector)
> >> + kfree_rcu(q_vector, rcu);
> >> + q_vector = new_q_vector;
> >
> >I wonder if this is correct.
> >1. if new_q_vector is NULL, you will overwrite q_vector without releasing it.
> >2. kfree_rcu() doesn't immediately release memory, but after grace
> >period, but here you are overwriting the pointer which is not release
> >yet.
>
> The actual pointer is: adapter->q_vector[v_idx]
>
> q_vector is just a convenience pointer.
>
> If the allocation succeeds, the q_vector[v_idx] will be replaced (later in the code).
>
> If the allocation fails, this is not being freed. The original code freed the adapter
> pointer but didn't not remove the pointer.
>
> If q_vector is NULL, (i.e. the allocation failed), the function exits, but the original
> pointer is left in place.
>
> I think this logic is correct.
>
> The error path leaves the original allocation in place. If this is incorrect behavior,
> a different change would be:
>
> q_vector = adapter->q_vector[v_idx];
> adapter->q_vector[v_idx] = NULL;
> ... the original code...
>
> But I am not sure if that is what is desired?
I understand the issue what you are trying to solve, I just don't
understand your RCU code. I would expect calls to rcu_dereference()
in order to get q_vector and rcu_assign_pointer() to clear
adapter->q_vector[v_idx], but igb has none.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221104205414.2354973-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
2022-11-04 20:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 5/6] igb: Do not free q_vector unless new one was allocated Tony Nguyen
2022-11-07 7:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-07 13:55 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-11-07 17:45 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-11-07 18:35 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-08 3:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 20:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 6/6] igb: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2lEK4CMdCyEMBLf@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox