From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:48:18 +0100 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 5/5] docs: networking: device_drivers: fix bad usage of UTF-8 chars In-Reply-To: <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> References: <95eb2a48d0ca3528780ce0dfce64359977fa8cb3.1620744606.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <8735utdt6z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:24:52PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Andrew Lunn writes: > > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar ?n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as `ifstat` or `sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]` > > > > ... > > > >> For example: min_rate 1Gbit 3Gbit: Verify bandwidth limit using network > >> -monitoring tools such as ifstat or sar ?n DEV [interval] [number of samples] > >> +monitoring tools such as ``ifstat`` or ``sar -n DEV [interval] [number of samples]`` > > > > Is there a difference between ` and `` ? Does it make sense to be > > consistent? > > This is `just weird quotes` umm ... `this` is supposed to be "interpreted text" https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#inline-markup Maybe we don't actually interpret it. > This is ``literal text`` set in monospace in processed output. > > There is a certain tension between those who want to see liberal use of > literal-text markup, and those who would rather have less markup in the > text overall; certainly, it's better not to go totally nuts with it. I really appreciate the work you did to reduce the amount of markup that's needed!