From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:43:06 +0300
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/5] devlink: Allow set
 specific ops callbacks dynamically
In-Reply-To: <20210929103823.GK2048@kadam>
References: <cover.1632909221.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
 <4e99e3996118ce0e2da5367b8fc2a427095dfffd.1632909221.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
 <20210929103823.GK2048@kadam>
Message-ID: <YVRDOijPHji2vg82@unreal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
List-ID: <intel-wired-lan.osuosl.org>

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:38:23PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:16:37PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +void devlink_set_ops(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > +	struct devlink_ops *dev_ops = devlink->ops;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_actions_valid(ops));
> > +
> > +#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, name)                                               \
> > +	do {                                                                   \
> > +		if (ops->name)                                                 \
> 
> Could you make "ops" a parameter of the macro instead of hard coding it?

Sure

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> > +			if (!((ptr)->name))				       \
> > +				(ptr)->name = ops->name;                       \
> > +	} while (0)
> > +
> > +	/* Keep sorted */
> > +	SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, reload_actions);
> > +	SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, reload_down);
> > +	SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, reload_limits);
> > +	SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, reload_up);
> > +
> > +#undef SET_DEVICE_OP
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_set_ops);
>