Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:01:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY0+PmNU4MSGfgqA@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110114448.2792314-3-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>

Hello Maciej,

2021-11-10, 12:44:44 +0100, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 5888492a5257..1d8662afd6bd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ enum {
>  	RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET,
>  #define RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET	RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET
>  
> +	RTM_GETEECSTATE = 124,
> +#define RTM_GETEECSTATE	RTM_GETEECSTATE

I'm not sure about this. All the other RTM_GETxxx are such that
RTM_GETxxx % 4 == 2. Following the current pattern, 124 should be
reserved for RTM_NEWxxx, and RTM_GETEECSTATE would be 126.

Also, why are you leaving a gap (which you end up filling in patch
4/6)?

> +
>  	__RTM_MAX,
>  #define RTM_MAX		(((__RTM_MAX + 3) & ~3) - 1)
>  };
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 2af8aeeadadf..03bc773d0e69 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -5467,6 +5467,83 @@ static int rtnl_stats_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>  	return skb->len;
>  }
>  
> +static int rtnl_fill_eec_state(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> +			       u32 portid, u32 seq, struct netlink_callback *cb,
> +			       int flags, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
[...]
> +	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, RTM_GETEECSTATE, sizeof(*state_msg),
> +			flags);
> +	if (!nlh)
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +	state_msg = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> +	state_msg->ifindex = dev->ifindex;

Why stuff this in a struct instead of using an attribute?

> +
> +	if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_STATE, state))
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +	if (!ops->ndo_get_eec_src)
> +		goto end_msg;
> +
> +	err = ops->ndo_get_eec_src(dev, &src_idx, extack);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_EEC_SRC_IDX, src_idx))
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +end_msg:
> +	nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

Thanks,

-- 
Sabrina


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-11 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-10 11:44 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 0/6] Add RTNL interface for SyncE Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 1/6] ice: add support detecting features based on netlist Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message to get SyncE status Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-11 16:01   ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2021-11-11 16:22     ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-16 14:40       ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 15:41         ` Florian Westphal
2021-11-16 19:30           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-16 14:37     ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 3/6] ice: add support for reading SyncE DPLL state Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 4/6] rtnetlink: Add support for SyncE recovered clock configuration Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 5/6] ice: add support for SyncE recovered clocks Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-10 11:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 6/6] docs: net: Add description of SyncE interfaces Maciej Machnikowski
2021-11-11 12:43   ` Petr Machata
2021-11-15 10:24     ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-11-16 11:07       ` Petr Machata
2021-11-16 11:52       ` Petr Machata
2021-11-16 14:26         ` Machnikowski, Maciej

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YY0+PmNU4MSGfgqA@hog \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox