From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: kbuild: Don't default net vendor configs to y
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:58:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfj2GTH3tHraprl0@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09c97169-5f9a-fc8f-dea5-5423e7bfef34@twofifty.com>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:55:14AM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> > On 1/31/2022 10:35 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > On 31 Jan 19:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:59 PM Stephen Hemminger
> > > > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:24:50 -0800
> > > > > Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NET_VENDOR_XYZ were defaulted to 'y' for no technical reason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since all drivers belonging to a vendor are supposed to default to 'n',
> > > > > > defaulting all vendors to 'n' shouldn't be an issue, and aligns well
> > > > > > with the 'no new drivers' by default mentality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This was done back when vendors were introduced in the
> > > > > network drivers tree.
> > > > > The default of Y allowed older configurations to just work.
> > > >
> > > > And changing the defaults means all defconfigs must be updated first,
> > > > else the user's configs will end up without drivers needed.
> > > >
> > >
> > > As I understand correctly, at least for most common net drivers,
> > > having NET_VENDOR_XYZ=y doesn't actually build anything, we have
> > > flags per
> > > module for each vendor and those are defaulted to N.
> >
> > Right, but once you start hiding NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ under a
> > NET_VENDOR_XYZ Kconfig symbol dependency, if NET_VENDOR_XYZ is not set
> > to Y, then you have no way to select NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ and so your
> > old defconfig breaks.
> >
> > >
> > > > > So there was a reason, not sure if it matters anymore.
> > > > > But it seems like useless repainting to change it now.
> > > >
> > > > It might make sense to tune some of the defaults (i.e. change to
> > > > "default y if ARCH_*") for drivers with clear platform dependencies.
> > > >
> > >
> > > either set hard default to 'n' or just keep it as is, anything else is just
> > > more confusion.
> >
> > Maybe the rule should go like this: any new driver vendor defaults to n,
> > and existing ones remain set to y, until we deprecate doing that and
> > switching them all off to n by 5.18?
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it a regression if things quit working
> even if it's just a configuration change?
No, kernel configs never were declared as ABI as "regular" users are not
supposed to touch it. They use something provided by the distro.
>
> From a user perspective I like having everything turned on initially so
> it just works. Pruning things down is a lot easier than trying to figure
> out what all to turn on. Especially in graphics.
I have completely opposite view here and prefer to have minimal config
for my CI, and for my working machines as well.
Thanks
>
> --
> Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd at twofifty.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-01 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 17:24 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: kbuild: Don't default net vendor configs to y Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-31 18:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-31 18:35 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 18:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-31 18:55 ` Hisashi T Fujinaka
2022-02-01 8:58 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-02-01 15:46 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-31 19:17 ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-31 20:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-31 23:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-31 23:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-31 23:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-02 4:46 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02 4:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-02 5:16 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02 6:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-02 6:44 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02 6:49 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02 15:17 ` Richard Cochran
2022-02-02 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-31 18:31 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 18:04 ` Shannon Nelson
2022-01-31 19:13 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yfj2GTH3tHraprl0@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox