Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: kbuild: Don't default net vendor configs to y
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:58:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfj2GTH3tHraprl0@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09c97169-5f9a-fc8f-dea5-5423e7bfef34@twofifty.com>

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:55:14AM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> > On 1/31/2022 10:35 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > On 31 Jan 19:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:59 PM Stephen Hemminger
> > > > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:24:50 -0800
> > > > > Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NET_VENDOR_XYZ were defaulted to 'y' for no technical reason.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since all drivers belonging to a vendor are supposed to default to 'n',
> > > > > > defaulting all vendors to 'n' shouldn't be an issue, and aligns well
> > > > > > with the 'no new drivers' by default mentality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > This was done back when vendors were introduced in the
> > > > > network drivers tree.
> > > > > The default of Y allowed older configurations to just work.
> > > > 
> > > > And changing the defaults means all defconfigs must be updated first,
> > > > else the user's configs will end up without drivers needed.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > As I understand correctly, at least for most common net drivers,
> > > having NET_VENDOR_XYZ=y doesn't actually build anything, we have
> > > flags per
> > > module for each vendor and those are defaulted to N.
> > 
> > Right, but once you start hiding NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ under a
> > NET_VENDOR_XYZ Kconfig symbol dependency, if NET_VENDOR_XYZ is not set
> > to Y, then you have no way to select NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ and so your
> > old defconfig breaks.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > > So there was a reason, not sure if it matters anymore.
> > > > > But it seems like useless repainting to change it now.
> > > > 
> > > > It might make sense to tune some of the defaults (i.e. change to
> > > > "default y if ARCH_*") for drivers with clear platform dependencies.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > either set hard default to 'n' or just keep it as is, anything else is just
> > > more confusion.
> > 
> > Maybe the rule should go like this: any new driver vendor defaults to n,
> > and existing ones remain set to y, until we deprecate doing that and
> > switching them all off to n by 5.18?
> 
> Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it a regression if things quit working
> even if it's just a configuration change?

No, kernel configs never were declared as ABI as "regular" users are not
supposed to touch it. They use something provided by the distro.

> 
> From a user perspective I like having everything turned on initially so
> it just works. Pruning things down is a lot easier than trying to figure
> out what all to turn on. Especially in graphics.

I have completely opposite view here and prefer to have minimal config
for my CI, and for my working machines as well. 

Thanks

> 
> -- 
> Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd at twofifty.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-01  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-31 17:24 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: kbuild: Don't default net vendor configs to y Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-31 18:30   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-31 18:35     ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 18:40       ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-31 18:55         ` Hisashi T Fujinaka
2022-02-01  8:58           ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-02-01 15:46             ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-31 19:17         ` Richard Cochran
2022-01-31 20:10         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-31 23:06           ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-31 23:13             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-01-31 23:19               ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-02  4:46                 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02  4:58                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-02  5:16                     ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02  6:30                       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-02  6:44                         ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02  6:49                         ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-02-02 15:17                           ` Richard Cochran
2022-02-02 15:31                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-31 18:31   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 18:04 ` Shannon Nelson
2022-01-31 19:13   ` Richard Cochran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yfj2GTH3tHraprl0@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox