Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 6/6] ice: Add support for PFCP hardware offload in switchdev

From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, simon.horman@corigine.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3 6/6] ice: Add support for PFCP hardware offload in switchdev
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:07:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLqfJZi/14dyEzhH@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721071532.613888-7-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:15:32AM +0200, Marcin Szycik wrote:
> Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add support
> for parsing PFCP-specific tc options: S flag and SEID.
> 
> To create a PFCP filter, a special netdev must be created and passed
> to tc command:
> 
> ip link add pfcp0 type pfcp
> tc filter add dev eth0 ingress prio 1 flower pfcp_opts \
> 1:123/ff:fffffffffffffff0 skip_hw action mirred egress redirect dev pfcp0

Can you indent this (by 2 spaces?) to differentiate with the commit message
itself?

> Changes in iproute2 [1] are required to be able to use pfcp_opts in tc.
> 
> ICE COMMS package is required to create a filter as it contains PFCP
> profiles.

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230614091758.11180-1-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com

We have Link: tag for such kind of stuff.

...

> +	if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_OPTS) &&
> +	    fltr->tunnel_type == TNL_PFCP) {
> +		struct flow_match_enc_opts match;
> +
> +		flow_rule_match_enc_opts(rule, &match);
> +
> +		memcpy(&fltr->pfcp_meta_keys, &match.key->data[0],
> +		       sizeof(struct pfcp_metadata));

Why not simply

		match.key->data

?

> +		memcpy(&fltr->pfcp_meta_masks, &match.mask->data[0],
> +		       sizeof(struct pfcp_metadata));

Ditto.

> +		fltr->flags |= ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_PFCP_OPTS;
> +	}

...

>  #ifndef _ICE_TC_LIB_H_
>  #define _ICE_TC_LIB_H_

Seems bits.h is missing...

> +#include <net/pfcp.h>
> +
>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_DST_MAC		BIT(0)
>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_SRC_MAC		BIT(1)
>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_VLAN			BIT(2)

...

>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_VLAN_PRIO		BIT(27)
>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_CVLAN_PRIO		BIT(28)
>  #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_VLAN_TPID		BIT(29)
> +#define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_PFCP_OPTS		BIT(30)
>  
>  #define ICE_TC_FLOWER_MASK_32   0xFFFFFFFF

...and (at least) this can utilize GENMASK().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan