From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] IRQ affinity not working properly?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:41:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa48b21f-c8da-0b9c-b7de-f100069ccba2@windriver.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have a CentOS 7 linux system with 48 logical CPUs and a number of
Intel NICs running the i40e driver. It was booted with
irqaffinity=0-1,24-25 in the kernel boot args, resulting in
/proc/irq/default_smp_affinity showing "0000,03000003". CPUs 2-11 are
set as "isolated" in the kernel boot args. The irqbalance daemon is not
running.
The iavf driver is 3.7.61.20 and the i40e driver is 2.10.19.82
The problem I'm seeing is that /proc/interrupts shows iavf interrupts on
other CPUs than the expected affinity. For example, here are some
interrupts on CPU 4 where I would not expect to see any interrupts given
that "cat /proc/irq/<NUM>/smp_affinity_list" reports "0-1,24-25" for all
these interrupts. (Sorry for the line wrapping.)
cat /proc/interrupts | grep -e CPU -e 941: -e 942: -e 943: -e 944: -e
945: -e 961: -e 962: -e 963: -e 964: -e 965:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5
941: 0 0 0 0 28490 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-0000:b5:03.6:mbx
942: 0 0 0 0 333832 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-0
943: 0 0 0 0 300842 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-1
944: 0 0 0 0 333845 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-2
945: 0 0 0 0 333822 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-3
961: 0 0 0 0 28492 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-0000:b5:02.7:mbx
962: 0 0 0 0 435608 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-0
963: 0 0 0 0 394832 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-1
964: 0 0 0 0 398414 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-2
965: 0 0 0 0 192847 0
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-net1-TxRx-3
There were IRQs coming in on the "iavf-0000:b5:02.7:mbx" interrupt at
roughly 1 per second without any traffic, while the interrupt rate on
the "iavf-net1-TxRx-<X>" seemed to be related to traffic.
Is this expected? It seems like the iavf and/or the i40e aren't
respecting the configured SMP affinity for the interrupt in question.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-29 15:41 Chris Friesen [this message]
2021-01-29 21:58 ` [Intel-wired-lan] IRQ affinity not working properly? Jesse Brandeburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa48b21f-c8da-0b9c-b7de-f100069ccba2@windriver.com \
--to=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox