From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA99C108B8FF for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFC9847DD; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id IC7gP4KlrZgo; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 90E39847DA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osuosl.org; s=default; t=1774077223; bh=uLHqQj34n75qO7wvSMbuHtDwvogwxolNUwo4NK7ta/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=NPVTySgz8XNsF3cvpiyidsNKJr654QvJWXHROKMbAT4rHIy/rxeX4aHeU936xHNuK gAMbg8Zw+7u5Oszn55cgmar7rGlTFcbaiOT/0DAjwPCY8zVHNMD989qj90jXdljk1Q TEN7UZnIubyvOXg1ESm2YOcWRWKt88isZhUh6qucv4wh4A3484qSrNpZM6glEXwRfZ SFkGpTcL1vwjq+YjqjBgcoZpmi8gb0JIru8FM2b7xd6iM9Q1OyoRT7M4Q27/QIn0fd 9VaVqIAb4mzmZSI6DyCHn+zsdxo0DiIBZI8l9sVf5+zA4HS8cHjIgxPGsa77GvaHy5 BrxOzGboOHdfQ== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E39847DA; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13263265 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC92040590 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id RB_9ahGvhhNb for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=49.212.198.91; helo=www2881.sakura.ne.jp; envelope-from=kohei@enjuk.jp; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp2.osuosl.org BF60540107 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org BF60540107 Received: from www2881.sakura.ne.jp (www2881.sakura.ne.jp [49.212.198.91]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF60540107 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2026 07:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1 (122.24.31.150.dy.iij4u.or.jp [150.31.24.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2881.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 62L7D5sQ089997 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:13:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kohei@enjuk.jp) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 16:13:05 +0900 From: Kohei Enju To: Tony Nguyen Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , dima.ruinskiy@intel.com, kohei.enju@gmail.com Message-ID: References: <20260317062205.39406-1-kohei@enjuk.jp> <20260319161140.GI1753385@horms.kernel.org> <02552c4b-e4ba-4750-afc9-aaa2a671f964@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02552c4b-e4ba-4750-afc9-aaa2a671f964@intel.com> X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=uLHqQj34n75qO7wvSMbuHtDwvogwxolNUwo4NK7ta/8=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enjuk.jp; h=From:Message-ID:To:Subject:Date; s=rs20251215; t=1774077187; v=1; b=JtUb3ghTj8Ha7O9mQq0ln+SFa8s+LDZ6sqhDGYPYRCThvtIHq1s7BPV4oGxLVCSu 9ZhdJVH6Z8g0romwv0kGHa3Yn4tOComdMh3+tppz5xwxLKzJuDfeyrplmIWaQJMe NMcnnkgLnJHQMmG0PQehgDgpsiy9jznFTfRjkkGtt17sLx/2uWJtFD6Sl0Zt2zV8 xAp2fBRtGxIYzeBgUoNDOWYYtac187lGT683XJC0edMnEZwkcNhauiVhATFyigVB rhECiTCaonWgNuRol7JZWILWGki+7G2HrMF3OwbCwqxOdtjOldBUmDDPkVcnrJvT 6y5k+tk26L8Vqyn/x319ew== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=enjuk.jp X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=enjuk.jp header.i=@enjuk.jp header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=rs20251215 header.b=JtUb3ghT Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" On 03/20 13:30, Tony Nguyen wrote: > > > On 3/19/2026 11:05 PM, Kohei Enju wrote: > > On 03/19 16:11, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 06:21:44AM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote: > > > > This series enables the build_skb RX path in igc, which is currently not > > > > enabled in any configuration. > > > > > > > > Patch 1/2 adds missing RX hardware timestamp handling in the build_skb > > > > path. > > > > Patch 2/2 enables the build_skb path when XDP is inactive and other > > > > conditions are met. > > > > > > > > Tested on Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04). > > > > > > > > Changes: > > > > v2: > > > > - don't insist on reverse christmas tree, reducing net diff in the > > > > patch 1/2 (Dima) > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20260307182808.155027-1-kohei@enjuk.jp/ > > > > > > > > Kohei Enju (2): > > > > igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() > > > > igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path > > > > > > For the series: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > > > Hi Tony, thanks for applying this series to next-queue. > > I have a question about the process of patch submission. > > > > Sometimes reviewers give RB tags for a whole series like this, but I > > think that those tags on the cover letter are not collected > > automatically, right? > > > > In this case, should I add RB tags to each patch if I respin for other > > reasons, or what is the recommended way to handle this? > > Hi Kohei, > > If you need to respin, feel free to carry the tags over. If you don't, I'll > bring them over. > > Thanks, > Tony > I understand. Thanks for explanation! Regards, Kohei