From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@intel.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
Alice Michael <alice.michael@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3] ice: Add E830 checksum offload support
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:15:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b148d2cd-a25f-4b42-917d-0bc92a0b0a19@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240917214547.3016085-1-paul.greenwalt@intel.com>
From: Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:45:47 -0400
> E830 supports raw receive and generic transmit checksum offloads.
>
> Raw receive checksum support is provided by hardware calculating the
> checksum over the whole packet, regardless of type. The calculated
> checksum is provided to driver in the Rx flex descriptor. Then the driver
> assigns the checksum to skb->csum and sets skb->ip_summed to
> CHECKSUM_COMPLETE.
>
> Generic transmit checksum support is provided by hardware calculating the
> checksum given two offsets: the start offset to begin checksum calculation,
> and the offset to insert the calculated checksum in the packet. Support is
> advertised to the stack using NETIF_F_HW_CSUM feature.
>
> E830 has the following limitations when both generic transmit checksum
> offload and TCP Segmentation Offload (TSO) are enabled:
>
> 1. Inner packet header modification is not supported. This restriction
> includes the inability to alter TCP flags, such as the push flag. As a
> result, this limitation can impact the receiver's ability to coalesce
> packets, potentially degrading network throughput.
> 2. The Maximum Segment Size (MSS) is limited to 1023 bytes, which prevents
> support of Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) greater than 1063 bytes.
>
> Therefore NETIF_F_HW_CSUM and NETIF_F_ALL_TSO features are mutually
> exclusive. NETIF_F_HW_CSUM hardware feature support is indicated but is not
> enabled by default. Instead, IP checksums and NETIF_F_ALL_TSO are the
> defaults. Enforcement of mutual exclusivity of NETIF_F_HW_CSUM and
> NETIF_F_ALL_TSO is done in ice_fix_features_tso_gcs(). Mutual exclusivity
> of IP checksums and NETIF_F_HW_CSUM is handled by netdev_fix_features().
>
> When NETIF_F_HW_CSUM is requested the provided skb->csum_start and
> skb->csum_offset are passed to hardware in the Tx context descriptor
> generic checksum (GCS) parameters. Hardware calculates the 1's complement
> from skb->csum_start to the end of the packet, and inserts the result in
> the packet at skb->csum_offset.
>
> Co-developed-by: Alice Michael <alice.michael@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Michael <alice.michael@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
The only tiny nitpick below. The window opened today, so Tony may ask
you to resubmit the patch so that he could take it.
[...]
> @@ -6283,6 +6321,8 @@ ice_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, __always_unused struct nlattr *tb[],
> * These are mutually exclusive as there is currently no way to
> * enable/disable VLAN filtering based on VLAN ethertype when using VLAN
> * prune rules.
> + *
> + * Return: updated features list
This change is not related to the series. But I don't have any
objections against it (not sure about the maintainers), so I think you
could leave it here. Just add a period to the end of the sentence.
> */
> static netdev_features_t
> ice_fix_features(struct net_device *netdev, netdev_features_t features)
> @@ -6338,6 +6378,9 @@ ice_fix_features(struct net_device *netdev, netdev_features_t features)
> features &= ~NETIF_VLAN_STRIPPING_FEATURES;
> }
>
> + if (ice_is_feature_supported(np->vsi->back, ICE_F_GCS))
> + features = ice_fix_features_gcs(netdev, features);
> +
> return features;
> }
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-30 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 21:45 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v3] ice: Add E830 checksum offload support Paul Greenwalt
2024-09-30 12:15 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-10-11 9:23 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b148d2cd-a25f-4b42-917d-0bc92a0b0a19@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alice.michael@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=eric.joyner@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox