Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "naamax.meir" <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/7] e1000e: remove unnecessary range check in e1000e_phc_adjfreq
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 07:44:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd95a82a-941c-772a-d96b-6a72f10a20ea@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721213001.2483596-4-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>

On 7/22/2022 00:29, Jacob Keller wrote:
> The e1000e_phc_adjfreq function validates that the input delta is within
> the maximum range. This is already handled by the core PTP code and this is
> a duplicate and thus unnecessary check. It also complicates refactoring to
> use the newer .adjfine implementation, where the input is no longer
> specified in parts per billion. Remove the range validation check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ptp.c | 3 ---
>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 21:29 [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 0/7] intel: ptp: convert .adjfreq to .adjfine Jacob Keller
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 1/7] ice: implement adjfine with mul_u64_u64_div_u64 Jacob Keller
2022-07-26 12:48   ` G, GurucharanX
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 1/1] igb: convert .adjfreq to .adjfine Jacob Keller
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 2/7] e1000e: remove unnecessary range check in e1000e_phc_adjfreq Jacob Keller
2022-07-25  4:44   ` naamax.meir [this message]
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 3/7] e1000e: convert .adjfreq to .adjfine Jacob Keller
2022-07-25 11:37   ` naamax.meir
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 4/7] i40e: use mul_u64_u64_div_u64 for PTP frequency calculation Jacob Keller
2022-07-26 12:48   ` G, GurucharanX
2022-07-21 21:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 5/7] i40e: convert .adjfreq to .adjfine Jacob Keller
2022-07-27  8:18   ` G, GurucharanX
2022-07-21 21:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 6/7] ixgbe: " Jacob Keller
2022-07-28  9:51   ` G, GurucharanX
2022-07-21 21:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [net-next PATCH 7/7] igb: " Jacob Keller
2022-07-28  9:52   ` G, GurucharanX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd95a82a-941c-772a-d96b-6a72f10a20ea@linux.intel.com \
    --to=naamax.meir@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox