From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Elliott, Rob" <elliott@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix NULL pointer access during resume
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:25:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd289ca9-0689-5cbc-a088-72f8efa8cb8e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB5089BAE82D6B60BACF3AF94FD6562@CO1PR11MB5089.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/22/2024 2:19 PM, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
...
>>> NOTE:
>>> Requires Amritha's patch:
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-
>> lan/patch/170785373072.3325.9129916579186572531.stgit@anambiarhost.jf.
>> intel.com/
>>> to be applied before this will pass testing cleanly.
>>
>> I think this may be the other way around? It looks to be clean for
>> netdev (doesn't have Amritha's patch), but it's not applying to
>> net-queue (has Amritha's patch).
>>
>> > base-commit: 23f9c2c066e7e5052406fb8f04a115d3d0260b22
>>
>> Base commit also seems to be a netdev commit.
>>
>> Since Amritha's patch is pending to netdev [1], I think we need a
>> version that will apply with Amritha's changes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240220214444.1039759-7-
>> anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/
>
> I think he means that the tests won't pass without Amritha's patch because we'll hit the ASSERT_RTNL in the suspend flow otherwise.
Got it. Anyways, this doesn't apply to net-queue, could we rebase or
base it off of that tree?
Thanks,
Tony
> Thanks,
> Jake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 23:17 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix NULL pointer access during resume Jesse Brandeburg
2024-02-22 22:10 ` Tony Nguyen
2024-02-22 22:19 ` Keller, Jacob E
2024-02-22 22:25 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2024-02-23 1:04 ` Jesse Brandeburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd289ca9-0689-5cbc-a088-72f8efa8cb8e@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox