From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efd6ceb1f182aa7364e9706422768a1c1335aee4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200413211550.8307-3-longman@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 17:15 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Since kfree_sensitive() will do an implicit memzero_explicit(), there
> is no need to call memzero_explicit() before it. Eliminate those
> memzero_explicit() and simplify the call sites.
2 bits of trivia:
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-cipher.c
[]
> @@ -391,10 +388,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_aes_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *key,
> dev_dbg(ce->dev, "ERROR: Invalid keylen %u\n", keylen);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - if (op->key) {
> - memzero_explicit(op->key, op->keylen);
> - kfree(op->key);
> - }
> + kfree_sensitive(op->key);
> op->keylen = keylen;
> op->key = kmemdup(key, keylen, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> if (!op->key)
It might be a defect to set op->keylen before the kmemdup succeeds.
> @@ -416,10 +410,7 @@ int sun8i_ce_des3_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *key,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (op->key) {
> - memzero_explicit(op->key, op->keylen);
> - kfree(op->key);
> - }
> + free_sensitive(op->key, op->keylen);
Why not kfree_sensitive(op->key) ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-13 21:15 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/2] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Waiman Long
2020-04-13 21:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/2] " Waiman Long
2020-04-14 0:29 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-14 8:32 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-14 9:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-14 12:48 ` David Sterba
2020-04-14 18:26 ` Waiman Long
2020-04-14 13:06 ` David Howells
2020-04-15 5:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-06-15 18:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-15 18:39 ` Waiman Long
2020-04-13 21:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit() Waiman Long
2020-04-13 21:31 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-04-13 21:52 ` Waiman Long
2020-04-13 22:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 " Waiman Long
2020-04-14 6:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-14 16:24 ` Waiman Long
2020-04-14 19:16 ` Michal =?unknown-8bit?q?Such=C3=A1nek?=
2020-04-14 19:37 ` Waiman Long
2020-04-14 19:44 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efd6ceb1f182aa7364e9706422768a1c1335aee4.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox