From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>,
Dan Nowlin <dan.nowlin@intel.com>,
Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] ice: refactor "last" segment of DDP pkg
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:06:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f902994c-6f8d-42b5-84d5-c9b277cd2b3a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017100659.GD1697@kernel.org>
On 10/17/24 12:06, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 02:10:31AM +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> Add ice_ddp_send_hunk() that buffers "sent FW hunk" calls to AQ in order
>> to mark the "last" one in more elegant way. Next commit will add even
>> more complicated "sent FW" flow, so it's better to untangle a bit before.
>>
>> Note that metadata buffers were not skipped for NOT-@indicate_last
>> segments, this is fixed now.
>>
>> Minor:
>> + use ice_is_buffer_metadata() instead of open coding it in
>> ice_dwnld_cfg_bufs();
>> + ice_dwnld_cfg_bufs_no_lock() + dependencies were moved up a bit to have
>> better git-diff, as this function was rewritten (in terms of git-blame)
>>
>> CC: Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>
>> CC: Dan Nowlin <dan.nowlin@intel.com>
>> CC: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
>
> Hi Przemek,
>
> Some minor feedback from my side.
Thank you for reaching out!
>> +static bool ice_is_buffer_metadata(struct ice_buf_hdr *buf)
>> +{
>> + return le32_to_cpu(buf->section_entry[0].type) & ICE_METADATA_BUF;
>
> I see this is moving existing logic around.
> And I see that this is a no-op on LE systems.
> But it might be nicer to perform the byte-order conversion on the constant.
As far as I remember, for this driver we always do have binary-arith
constants (flags, masks, etc) in CPU-order, so do as I did.
I could imagine keeping all such constants in HW-order, and such
approach could potentially set the boundary for byte-order conversions
to be better expressed/illustrated.
For new drivers, I will still think more about unit-test-abilty instead,
and those will be easiest with as much constants expressed in CPU-order.
No strong opinion here anyway, and I think we agree that it's most
important to be consistent within the driver/component. I manually
sampled that for ice, but I don't have a proof.
>> +/**
>> + * struct ice_ddp_send_ctx - sending context of current DDP segment
>> + * @hw: pointer to the hardware struct
>> + *
>> + * Keeps current sending state (header, error) for the purpose of proper "last"
>> + * bit settting in ice_aq_download_pkg(). Use via calls to ice_ddp_send_hunk().
>
> setting
>
>> + */
>> +struct ice_ddp_send_ctx {
>> + struct ice_hw *hw;
>> +/* private: only for ice_ddp_send_hunk() */
>> + struct ice_buf_hdr *hdr;
>> + int err;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * ice_ddp_send_hunk - send one hunk of data to FW
>> + * @ctx - current segment sending context
>> + * @hunk - next hunk to send, size is always ICE_PKG_BUF_SIZE
>
> Tooling seems to expect the following syntax.
>
> * @ctx: ...
> * @hunk: ...
oops, sorry!
>> +static enum ice_ddp_state
>> +ice_dwnld_cfg_bufs_no_lock(struct ice_ddp_send_ctx *ctx, struct ice_buf *bufs,
>> + u32 start, u32 count)
>> +{
>> + struct ice_buf_hdr *bh;
>> + enum ice_ddp_state err;
>> +
>> + if (!bufs || !count) {
>> + ctx->err = ICE_DDP_PKG_ERR;
>> + return ctx->err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bufs += start;
>> + bh = (struct ice_buf_hdr *)bufs;
>
> Again I see that, to some extent, this is moving existing logic around.
> But as bh is set in each loop iteration does it also need to be set here?
good point
ice_is_buffer_metadata() check was prior to the loop, now it is inside,
I will remove the redundant assignment.
>> @@ -1454,17 +1459,16 @@ ice_dwnld_sign_and_cfg_segs(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_pkg_hdr *pkg_hdr,
>> }
>>
>> count = le32_to_cpu(seg->signed_buf_count);
>> - state = ice_download_pkg_sig_seg(hw, seg);
>> + state = ice_download_pkg_sig_seg(ctx, seg);
>> if (state || !count)
>> goto exit;
>>
>> conf_idx = le32_to_cpu(seg->signed_seg_idx);
>> start = le32_to_cpu(seg->signed_buf_start);
>>
>> - state = ice_download_pkg_config_seg(hw, pkg_hdr, conf_idx, start,
>> - count);
>> -
>> + return ice_download_pkg_config_seg(ctx, pkg_hdr, conf_idx, start, count);
>
> This changes the conditions under which this function sets
> ctx->err, which is then changed again by the following patch.
> Is that intentional?
>
>> exit:
>> + ctx->err = state;
This line is unusual as it changes ctx->err from ctx user code.
ctx itself updates @err only on new error, it uses "retained error"
style of API (that I'm clearly a fan of ;))
Next commit replaces the last (successful) write (via ctx) of ddp,
and error return from new path would result in
"ctx->err = ctx->err" update. Not clear, not intentional, not harmful.
I will update code to leave less space for confusion.
>> return state;
>> }
>
> ...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 0:10 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] Refactor sending DDP + E830 support Przemek Kitszel
2024-10-03 0:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] ice: refactor "last" segment of DDP pkg Przemek Kitszel
2024-10-11 9:37 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-10-17 10:06 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-18 12:06 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2024-10-18 20:25 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-03 0:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/2] ice: support optional flags in signature segment header Przemek Kitszel
2024-10-11 9:39 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f902994c-6f8d-42b5-84d5-c9b277cd2b3a@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=dan.nowlin@intel.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox