From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tian Xun Ng" <luckilystar08@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v3] idpf: keep the mailbox up while tearing down vports on shutdown
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 03:27:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166245@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009032706.94324-1-luckilystar08@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net: idpf: use-after-free of PTP tx_tstamp_caps during shutdown
--
commit 5449e12bf292e1f9d4473ed0d51fe60b2a67f6b3
Author: Tian Xun Ng <tianxun.ng@bytedance.com>
idpf: keep the mailbox up while tearing down vports on shutdown
Since commit 4c9106f4906a ("idpf: fix adapter NULL pointer dereference
on reboot"), idpf_shutdown() calls idpf_vc_core_deinit() directly instead
of idpf_remove(), so IDPF_REMOVE_IN_PROG is not set on shutdown.
idpf_vc_core_deinit() uses that flag to decide when to shut the virtchnl
transaction manager down.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> index 129bccaa6baa8..ec751f4a6deb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_main.c
> @@ -194,8 +194,17 @@ static void idpf_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct idpf_adapter *adapter = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + /* As in idpf_remove(): keep the event task from being requeued, and
> + * destroy the vports while the mailbox is still up.
> + */
> + set_bit(IDPF_REMOVE_IN_PROG, adapter->flags);
[Severity: High]
Does setting IDPF_REMOVE_IN_PROG here expose a use-after-free race during reboot?
When this flag is set, idpf_vc_core_deinit() defers shutting down the
transaction manager (via libie_ctlq_xn_shutdown()) until the very end.
However, it also calls idpf_ptp_release() earlier in the function, which
synchronously frees vport->tx_tstamp_caps via idpf_ptp_release_vport_tstamp()
in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ptp.c.
Because the transaction manager and mailbox task remain active during this
window, an asynchronous PTP Tx timestamp reply can still be received.
If that happens, the mailbox handler idpf_ptp_get_tx_tstamp_async_handler()
in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl_ptp.c can dereference the
freed tx_tstamp_caps pointer, leading to a panic.
While the commit message mentions that a race already exists in the remove
path, setting this flag appears to newly expose the same vulnerability in the
shutdown path.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009032706.94324-1-luckilystar08@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 3:27 [PATCH iwl-net v3] idpf: keep the mailbox up while tearing down vports on shutdown Tian Xun Ng
2026-10-09 21:48 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2026-10-10 3:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166245@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=luckilystar08@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox