From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jacob Keller" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
"Intel Wired LAN" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 3/4] ice: store cached PHC time in ice_adapter
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 23:52:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-213880@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113-jk-e825-e830-timecounter-v2-3-9c357a7ed349@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] ice: stale adapter->phc cache across reset in
ice_ptp_rebuild_owner()
--
commit 3e2553cade32eeca4938b383704866bc53bd38ea
Author: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
ice: store cached PHC time in ice_adapter
This commit moves the cached PHC time and its update timestamp from the
per-PF ice_ptp and Rx ring structures into a shared struct ice_phc embedded
in ice_adapter, updated only by the clock owner PF.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
> index bf37c2a7ff863..a0451c1083a41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3099,24 +3056,20 @@ static void ice_ptp_periodic_work(struct kthread_work *work)
> {
> struct ice_ptp *ptp = container_of(work, struct ice_ptp, work.work);
> struct ice_pf *pf = container_of(ptp, struct ice_pf, ptp);
> - int err;
>
> if (pf->ptp.state != ICE_PTP_READY)
> return;
>
> ice_ptp_tspll_monitor(pf);
>
> - err = ice_ptp_update_cached_phctime(pf);
> + if (ice_pf_src_tmr_owned(pf))
> + ice_ptp_update_cached_phctime(pf);
>
> ice_ptp_maybe_trigger_tx_interrupt(pf);
>
> - /* Run twice a second, or retry soon if another thread was busy
> - * updating the Rx rings. Other errors, such as a missing control PF,
> - * do not clear up on their own and must not turn the periodic worker
> - * into a busy loop.
> - */
> + /* Run twice a second */
> kthread_queue_delayed_work(ptp->kworker, &ptp->work,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(err == -EAGAIN ? 10 : 500));
> + msecs_to_jiffies(500));
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3211,6 +3164,8 @@ void ice_ptp_prepare_for_reset(struct ice_pf *pf, enum ice_reset_req reset_type)
>
> /* Acquire PHC and system timer to restore after reset */
> ptp->reset_time = ktime_get_real_ns();
> + if (ice_ptp_read_src_clk_reg(pf, NULL, &ptp->phc_reset_time))
> + ptp->phc_reset_time = 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3250,13 +3205,13 @@ static int ice_ptp_rebuild_owner(struct ice_pf *pf)
> if (err)
> goto err_unlock;
>
> - /* Write the initial Time value to PHY and LAN using the cached PHC
> - * time before the reset and time difference between stopping and
> - * starting the clock.
> + /* Write the initial Time value to PHY and LAN using the PHC time
> + * before the reset and time difference between stopping and starting
> + * the clock.
> */
> - if (ptp->cached_phc_time) {
> + if (ptp->phc_reset_time) {
> time_diff = ktime_get_real_ns() - ptp->reset_time;
> - ts = ns_to_timespec64(ptp->cached_phc_time + time_diff);
> + ts = ns_to_timespec64(ptp->phc_reset_time + time_diff);
> } else {
> ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime_get_real());
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does ice_ptp_rebuild_owner() leave a stale cached_time in pf->adapter->phc
across a non-PFR reset?
When a reset such as EMPR zeroes GLTSYN_TIME before
ice_ptp_prepare_for_reset() reads it, ptp->phc_reset_time is 0 and
ice_ptp_rebuild_owner() reinitializes the hardware clock to
ktime_get_real() (UTC) via ice_ptp_write_init(), which can differ from a
pre-reset TAI PHC by 37 seconds. Neither ice_ptp_prepare_for_reset() nor
ice_ptp_rebuild_owner() invalidates or refreshes pf->adapter->phc after
writing the new time, and non-owner PFs no longer update the cache in
ice_ptp_periodic_work().
If the reset and rebuild finish within 2000 ms of the last pre-reset
update, ice_ptp_extend_32b_ts() still sees a fresh phc->update_jiffies and
extends post-reset Rx and Tx hardware timestamps against the pre-reset
phc->cached_time until the owner PF's kworker runs
ice_ptp_periodic_work().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113-jk-e825-e830-timecounter-v2-0-9c357a7ed349@intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 23:30 [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/4] ice: E825 timer adjustment fixes Jacob Keller
2026-11-13 23:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/4] ice: fix computation of ETF timestamps for E830 Jacob Keller
2026-11-13 23:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/4] ice: exit PTP callbacks early if not ICE_PTP_READY Jacob Keller
2026-11-13 23:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 3/4] ice: store cached PHC time in ice_adapter Jacob Keller
2026-11-13 23:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-13 23:30 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 4/4] ice: use struct timecounter for E825 and E830 Jacob Keller
2026-11-13 23:46 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-213880@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox