From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/vrr: Reorder the DSB "wait for safe window" vs. TRANS_PUSH
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:16:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02251d7d-b127-4d5c-9225-990dd9d5cd49@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250130184518.22353-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On 1/31/2025 12:15 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently we trigger the push send first, then follow it with
> a "wait for safe window". That approach no longer works on
> PTL+ because triggering the push send immediately ends the safe
> window. On prior hardware the safe window extended past the
> push being sent (presumably all the way to the pipe's delayed
> vblank).
>
> In order to deal with the new hardware behaviour we must reverse
> the order of these two operations: first wait for safe window,
> then trigger the push.
>
> The only slight danger with this approach is that if we mess up
> the vblank evasion around the vmax decision boundary the push
> might get postponed until after the next frame's vactive. But
> assuming we don't mess up the vblank evasion this approach is
> completely safe.
>
> As a slight bonus we can perform the push after we've done the
> LUT writes as well, meaning we no longer have to worry about
> extending the vblank delay to provide enough time for LUT
> programming. Instead we will now depend on the vblank evasion
> at vmax decision boundary to guarantee this.
>
> However vblank delay (or framestart delay) is still the only
> way to provide extra time for the LUT programming in the
> non-VRR use cases. Let's assume we don't need anything extra
> for now, but eventually we should come up with some proper
> estimates on how long the LUT programming can take and
> configure the vblank delay accordingly for the non-VRR use
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 ++----------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index 8400a97f7e43..be2691a80227 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> #include "intel_dsb.h"
> +#include "intel_vrr.h"
>
> struct intel_color_funcs {
> int (*color_check)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> @@ -1987,6 +1988,7 @@ void intel_color_prepare_commit(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> display->funcs.color->load_luts(crtc_state);
>
> + intel_vrr_send_push(crtc_state->dsb_color_vblank, crtc_state);
> intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(state, crtc_state->dsb_color_vblank);
> intel_dsb_interrupt(crtc_state->dsb_color_vblank);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 60867b5b03ec..69dbb0eb5ca1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2630,14 +2630,6 @@ static int intel_crtc_vblank_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> if (intel_crtc_needs_wa_14015401596(crtc_state))
> vblank_delay = max(vblank_delay, 1);
>
> - /*
> - * Add a minimal vblank delay to make sure the push
> - * doesn't race with the "wait for safe window" used
> - * for frame completion with DSB.
> - */
> - if (intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state))
> - vblank_delay = max(vblank_delay, 1);
> -
> return vblank_delay;
> }
>
> @@ -7735,10 +7727,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> intel_crtc_planes_update_arm(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit,
> state, crtc);
>
> - intel_vrr_send_push(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, new_crtc_state);
> -
> if (!new_crtc_state->dsb_color_vblank) {
> intel_dsb_wait_vblanks(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, 1);
> +
> + intel_vrr_send_push(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit, new_crtc_state);
> intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay(state, new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
> intel_dsb_interrupt(new_crtc_state->dsb_commit);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 18:45 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/vrr: Fix DSB+VRR usage for PTL+ Ville Syrjala
2025-01-30 18:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_poll() Ville Syrjala
2025-02-06 9:27 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-01-30 18:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/vrr: Reorder the DSB "wait for safe window" vs. TRANS_PUSH Ville Syrjala
2025-02-06 9:46 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-01-30 18:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/vrr: Poll for the push send bit to clear on the DSB Ville Syrjala
2025-02-06 9:52 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-01-30 19:13 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/vrr: Fix DSB+VRR usage for PTL+ Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:13 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:31 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:33 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:35 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-30 19:54 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-30 22:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02251d7d-b127-4d5c-9225-990dd9d5cd49@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox