Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
	"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Satyanarayana K V P" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Fix GuC FW check for VF migration support
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:17:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05e13fdb-cad6-43da-95e2-174ccc919833@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020205808.1187308-3-tomasz.lis@intel.com>



On 10/20/2025 10:58 PM, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> The check whether GuC ABI version meets requirements shall be
> performed after said version is received from GuC.
> 
> Doing it in wrong order was triggering a warning:
> xe 0000:00:02.1: [drm] Assertion `gt->sriov.vf.guc_version.major` failed!
> 
> With this change, dislodge part of the VF migration support check
> and moved it to after GuC handshake.
> 
> v2: Use xe_sriov_vf_ccs_migration_bb_needed()
> 
> v3: Update commit message, move check funct to ccs module (Michal),
>  rename xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(), remove its duplicate
> 
> Tested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> #v1
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/6349
> Fixes: be5590c384f3 ("drm/xe/vf: Enable CCS save/restore only on supported GUC versions")

hmm, but this was likely working fine until this:

commit ff1d2b5e3d28a62e79c89d2b2ab28ef5eaab84d8
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Oct 13 13:09:50 2025 -0700

    drm/xe: Read VF GMD_ID with a specifically-allocated dummy GT

so maybe Fixes: shall point that commit instead? 

@Lucas ?

> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c     | 24 ++++++++----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h     |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> index 911d5720917b..3a3cd9c35aa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ bool xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return xe->sriov.vf.migration.enabled;
>  }
>  
> -static void vf_disable_migration(struct xe_device *xe, const char *fmt, ...)
> +void xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(struct xe_device *xe, const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
>  	struct va_format vaf;
>  	va_list va_args;
> @@ -156,25 +156,15 @@ static void vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	 * supported at production quality.
>  	 */
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG))
> -		return vf_disable_migration(xe,
> -					    "experimental feature not available on production builds");
> +		return xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(xe,
> +				"experimental feature not available on production builds");
>  
>  	if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20)
> -		return vf_disable_migration(xe, "requires gfx version >= 20, but only %u found",
> -					    GRAPHICS_VER(xe));
> -
> -	if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) {
> -		struct xe_uc_fw_version guc_version;
> -
> -		xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_versions(xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0), NULL, &guc_version);
> -		if (MAKE_GUC_VER_STRUCT(guc_version) < MAKE_GUC_VER(1, 23, 0))
> -			return vf_disable_migration(xe,
> -						    "CCS migration requires GuC ABI >= 1.23 but only %u.%u found",
> -						    guc_version.major, guc_version.minor);
> -	}
> +		return xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(xe,
> +				"requires gfx version >= 20, but only %u found",
> +				GRAPHICS_VER(xe));
>  
>  	xe->sriov.vf.migration.enabled = true;

as said earlier, we should change the logic to

 	xe->sriov.vf.migration.disabled = true;

and set this in xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable()


> -	xe_sriov_dbg(xe, "migration support enabled\n");
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -198,6 +188,8 @@ int xe_sriov_vf_init_late(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> +	xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_support_check(xe);

why not move that to xe_sriov_vf_ccs_init() called just below?

then you will not have to export 

	xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_support_check
nor
	xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_needed

as everything will be in xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c

> +
>  	if (xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(xe))
>  		err = xe_sriov_vf_ccs_init(xe);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> index 4df95266b261..e967d4166a43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct xe_device;
>  void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_sriov_vf_init_late(struct xe_device *xe);
>  bool xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(struct xe_device *xe, const char *fmt, ...);
>  void xe_sriov_vf_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe, struct dentry *root);
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c
> index a2d61b37ff21..02d0fcd26399 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  #include "xe_device.h"
>  #include "xe_exec_queue.h"
>  #include "xe_exec_queue_types.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> +#include "xe_guc.h"
>  #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
>  #include "xe_lrc.h"
>  #include "xe_migrate.h"
> @@ -275,6 +277,29 @@ bool xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_needed(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return !IS_DGFX(xe) && xe_device_has_flat_ccs(xe);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_support_check - Check for disable migration due to FW version.
> + * @xe: the &xe_device instance.
> + *
> + * Performs late disable of VF migration feature in case GuC FW cannot support it.
> + */
> +void xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_support_check(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	if (!xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(xe))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_needed(xe)) {
> +		struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
> +		struct xe_uc_fw_version guc_version;
> +
> +		xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_versions(gt, NULL, &guc_version);
> +		if (MAKE_GUC_VER_STRUCT(guc_version) < MAKE_GUC_VER(1, 23, 0))
> +			return xe_sriov_vf_migration_disable(xe,
> +				"CCS migration requires GuC ABI >= 1.23 but only %u.%u found",
> +				guc_version.major, guc_version.minor);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void xe_sriov_vf_ccs_fini(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct xe_sriov_vf_ccs_ctx *ctx = arg;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h
> index 0e6b27016dac..2844628269d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct xe_device;
>  struct xe_bo;
>  
>  bool xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_needed(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_sriov_vf_migration_ccs_bb_support_check(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
>  int xe_sriov_vf_ccs_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_sriov_vf_ccs_attach_bo(struct xe_bo *bo);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20 20:58 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/xe/vf: Minor fixes to post-migration recovery Tomasz Lis
2025-10-20 20:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/xe/vf: Helper for telling whether CCS migration BBs are needed Tomasz Lis
2025-10-20 20:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Fix GuC FW check for VF migration support Tomasz Lis
2025-10-20 22:17   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-10-20 23:46     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-20 20:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/xe: Assert that VF will never use fixed placement of BOs Tomasz Lis
2025-10-20 21:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-20 22:48     ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-21 15:04       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-21 17:20         ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-20 20:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/xe/vf: Do not disable VF migration on ATS-M Tomasz Lis
2025-10-20 21:53   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-21 10:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/vf: Minor fixes to post-migration recovery (rev4) Patchwork
2025-10-21 12:41 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-10-21 13:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05e13fdb-cad6-43da-95e2-174ccc919833@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
    --cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox