Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
	koby.elbaz@intel.com, yaron.avizrat@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/xe: Add xe_mmio_init() initialization function
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:53:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0969242a-f433-41f7-a217-036e46f19c29@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213093559.204652-1-ilia.levi@intel.com>



On 13.02.2025 10:35, Ilia Levi wrote:
> Add a convenience function for minimal initialization of struct xe_mmio.
> This function also validates that the entirety of the provided mmio region
> is usable with struct xe_reg.
> 
> v2: Modify commit message, add kernel doc, refactor assert (Michal)
> v3: Fix off-by-one bug, add clarifying macro (Michal)
> v4: Derive bitfield width from size (Michal)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Levi <ilia.levi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c            |  7 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c          | 32 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h          |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h
> index 89716172fbb8..c39aab843e35 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_reg_defs.h
> @@ -7,9 +7,21 @@
>  #define _XE_REG_DEFS_H_
>  
>  #include <linux/build_bug.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
>  
>  #include "compat-i915-headers/i915_reg_defs.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * XE_REG_ADDR_MAX - The upper limit on MMIO register address
> + *
> + * This macro specifies the upper limit (not inclusive) on MMIO register offset
> + * supported by struct xe_reg and functions based on struct xe_mmio.
> + *
> + * Currently this is defined as 4 MiB.
> + */
> +#define XE_REG_ADDR_MAX	SZ_4M
> +
>  /**
>   * struct xe_reg - Register definition
>   *
> @@ -21,7 +33,7 @@ struct xe_reg {
>  	union {
>  		struct {
>  			/** @addr: address */
> -			u32 addr:22;
> +			u32 addr:const_ilog2(XE_REG_ADDR_MAX);
>  			/**
>  			 * @masked: register is "masked", with upper 16bits used
>  			 * to identify the bits that are updated on the lower
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 01a4a852b8f4..f10c1f5fbbe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -637,10 +637,9 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  void xe_gt_mmio_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  {
>  	struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
>  
> -	gt->mmio.regs = tile->mmio.regs;
> -	gt->mmio.regs_size = tile->mmio.regs_size;
> -	gt->mmio.tile = tile;
> +	xe_mmio_init(&gt->mmio, tile, tile->mmio.regs, tile->mmio.regs_size);
>  
>  	if (gt->info.type == XE_GT_TYPE_MEDIA) {
>  		gt->mmio.adj_offset = MEDIA_GT_GSI_OFFSET;
> @@ -650,7 +649,7 @@ void xe_gt_mmio_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  		gt->mmio.adj_limit = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)))
> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>  		gt->mmio.sriov_vf_gt = gt;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> index 3aed849a128b..70a36e777546 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static void tiles_fini(void *arg)
>  static void mmio_multi_tile_setup(struct xe_device *xe, size_t tile_mmio_size)
>  {
>  	struct xe_tile *tile;
> -	void __iomem *regs;
>  	u8 id;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -94,13 +93,8 @@ static void mmio_multi_tile_setup(struct xe_device *xe, size_t tile_mmio_size)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	regs = xe->mmio.regs;
> -	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
> -		tile->mmio.regs_size = SZ_4M;
> -		tile->mmio.regs = regs;
> -		tile->mmio.tile = tile;
> -		regs += tile_mmio_size;
> -	}
> +	for_each_remote_tile(tile, xe, id)
> +		xe_mmio_init(&tile->mmio, tile, xe->mmio.regs + id * tile_mmio_size, SZ_4M);
>  }
>  
>  int xe_mmio_probe_tiles(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -140,13 +134,29 @@ int xe_mmio_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Setup first tile; other tiles (if present) will be setup later. */
> -	root_tile->mmio.regs_size = SZ_4M;
> -	root_tile->mmio.regs = xe->mmio.regs;
> -	root_tile->mmio.tile = root_tile;
> +	xe_mmio_init(&root_tile->mmio, root_tile, xe->mmio.regs, SZ_4M);
>  
>  	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, mmio_fini, xe);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xe_mmio_init() - Initialize an MMIO instance
> + * @mmio: Pointer to the MMIO instance to initialize
> + * @tile: The tile to which the MMIO region belongs
> + * @ptr: Pointer to the start of the MMIO region
> + * @size: The size of the MMIO region in bytes
> + *
> + * This is a convenience function for minimal initialization of struct xe_mmio.
> + */
> +void xe_mmio_init(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_tile *tile, void __iomem *ptr, u32 size)

nit: mmio->regs_size has type size_t so being strict we should use the
same type here instead of u32, but since we only pass SZ_4M ...

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

> +{
> +	xe_tile_assert(tile, size <= XE_REG_ADDR_MAX);
> +
> +	mmio->regs = ptr;
> +	mmio->regs_size = size;
> +	mmio->tile = tile;
> +}
> +
>  static void mmio_flush_pending_writes(struct xe_mmio *mmio)
>  {
>  #define DUMMY_REG_OFFSET	0x130030
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> index b32e7ee4b23e..c151ba569003 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ struct xe_reg;
>  int xe_mmio_probe_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_mmio_probe_tiles(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
> +void xe_mmio_init(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_tile *tile, void __iomem *ptr, u32 size);
> +
>  u8 xe_mmio_read8(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
>  u16 xe_mmio_read16(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg);
>  void xe_mmio_write32(struct xe_mmio *mmio, struct xe_reg reg, u32 val);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-30 10:50 [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early Ilia Levi
2025-01-30 10:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add xe_mmio_init() initialization function Ilia Levi
2025-01-30 19:03   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-01-30 19:54   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-01-31  7:37     ` Levi, Ilia
2025-02-02 11:00     ` [PATCH v2 " Ilia Levi
2025-02-05 15:56       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-02-09 13:13         ` [PATCH v3 " Ilia Levi
2025-02-12 23:18           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-02-13  9:35             ` [PATCH v4 " Ilia Levi
2025-02-13 23:53               ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-02-09 13:34         ` [PATCH v2 " Levi, Ilia
2025-01-30 11:48 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early Patchwork
2025-01-30 11:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 11:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 12:06 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 12:09 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 12:10 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 12:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-01-30 14:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-30 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lucas De Marchi
2025-02-02 11:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-02 11:56 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 11:57 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 12:13 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 12:15 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 12:17 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 12:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-02 13:45 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:30 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early (rev3) Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:30 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:48 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:50 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 13:51 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 14:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-09 15:23 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-13  9:41 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early (rev4) Patchwork
2025-02-13  9:42 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-02-13  9:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-02-13  9:59 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 10:02 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-13 10:03 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-14  5:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-17  8:02 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-18 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: s/xe_mmio_init/xe_mmio_probe_early Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0969242a-f433-41f7-a217-036e46f19c29@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=ilia.levi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=koby.elbaz@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=yaron.avizrat@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox