From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 16/20] drm/xe: Remove mem_access calls from migration
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 12:33:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c1b0948-0a00-4881-af37-e47573687c0e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231228021232.2366249-17-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On 28/12/2023 02:12, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> The sched jobs runtime pm calls already protects every execution,
> including these migration ones.
Is job really enough here? I assume queue is only destroyed once it has
no more jobs and the final queue ref is dropped. And destroying the
queue might involve stuff like de-register the context with GuC etc.
which needs to use CT which will need rpm ref. What is holding the rpm
if not the vm or queue?
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 17 -----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 18 ------------------
> 4 files changed, 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c
> index 7a32faa2f6888..2257f0a28435b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -428,9 +428,7 @@ static int migrate_test_run_device(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> kunit_info(test, "Testing tile id %d.\n", id);
> xe_vm_lock(m->q->vm, true);
> - xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
> xe_migrate_sanity_test(m, test);
> - xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
> xe_vm_unlock(m->q->vm);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index ee9b6612eec43..a7bec49da49fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -675,23 +675,6 @@ void xe_device_assert_mem_access(struct xe_device *xe)
> XE_WARN_ON(xe_pm_runtime_suspended(xe));
> }
>
> -bool xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> - bool active;
> -
> - if (xe_pm_read_callback_task(xe) == current)
> - return true;
> -
> - active = xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe);
> - if (active) {
> - int ref = atomic_inc_return(&xe->mem_access.ref);
> -
> - xe_assert(xe, ref != S32_MAX);
> - }
> -
> - return active;
> -}
> -
> void xe_device_mem_access_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> int ref;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index af8ac2e9e2709..4acf4c2973390 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ static inline struct xe_force_wake *gt_to_fw(struct xe_gt *gt)
> }
>
> void xe_device_mem_access_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> -bool xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_device_mem_access_put(struct xe_device *xe);
>
> void xe_device_assert_mem_access(struct xe_device *xe);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> index 44fe8097b7cda..d3a8d2d8caaaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> @@ -87,17 +87,6 @@ static struct xe_exec_queue *__xe_exec_queue_create(struct xe_device *xe,
> if (err)
> goto err_lrc;
>
> - /*
> - * Normally the user vm holds an rpm ref to keep the device
> - * awake, and the context holds a ref for the vm, however for
> - * some engines we use the kernels migrate vm underneath which offers no
> - * such rpm ref, or we lack a vm. Make sure we keep a ref here, so we
> - * can perform GuC CT actions when needed. Caller is expected to have
> - * already grabbed the rpm ref outside any sensitive locks.
> - */
> - if (!(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT) && (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM || !vm))
> - drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, !xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(xe));
> -
> return q;
>
> err_lrc:
> @@ -172,8 +161,6 @@ void xe_exec_queue_fini(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>
> for (i = 0; i < q->width; ++i)
> xe_lrc_finish(q->lrc + i);
> - if (!(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT) && (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM || !q->vm))
> - xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(q->gt));
> if (q->vm)
> xe_vm_put(q->vm);
>
> @@ -643,9 +630,6 @@ int xe_exec_queue_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !hwe))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* The migration vm doesn't hold rpm ref */
> - xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
> -
> migrate_vm = xe_migrate_get_vm(gt_to_tile(gt)->migrate);
> new = xe_exec_queue_create(xe, migrate_vm, logical_mask,
> args->width, hwe,
> @@ -655,8 +639,6 @@ int xe_exec_queue_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_BIND_ENGINE_CHILD :
> 0));
>
> - xe_device_mem_access_put(xe); /* now held by engine */
> -
> xe_vm_put(migrate_vm);
> if (IS_ERR(new)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(new);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-28 2:12 [RFC 00/20] First attempt to kill mem_access Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 01/20] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 02/20] drm/xe: Fix display runtime_pm handling Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 03/20] drm/xe: Create a xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get variant for display Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 04/20] drm/xe: Convert xe_pm_runtime_{get, put} to void and protect from recursion Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 05/20] drm/xe: Prepare display for D3Cold Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 06/20] drm/xe: Convert mem_access assertion towards the runtime_pm state Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 11:06 ` Matthew Auld
2024-01-09 17:50 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 07/20] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every IOCTL Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-02 11:30 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-01-09 17:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 08/20] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every exec Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 11:24 ` Matthew Auld
2024-01-09 17:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 18:40 ` Matthew Auld
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 09/20] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every sysfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 10/20] drm/xe: Sort some xe_pm_runtime related functions Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 11:26 ` Matthew Auld
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 11/20] drm/xe: Ensure device is awake before removing it Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 12/20] drm/xe: Remove mem_access from guc_pc calls Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 13/20] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every debugfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 14/20] drm/xe: Replace dma_buf mem_access per direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 15/20] drm/xe: Allow GuC CT fast path and worker regardless of runtime_pm Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 12:09 ` Matthew Auld
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 16/20] drm/xe: Remove mem_access calls from migration Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 12:33 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-01-09 17:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 18:49 ` Matthew Auld
2024-01-09 22:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-11 14:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 17/20] drm/xe: Removing extra mem_access protection from runtime pm Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 18/20] drm/xe: Convert hwmon from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 19/20] drm/xe: Remove unused runtime pm helper Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-28 2:12 ` [RFC 20/20] drm/xe: Mega Kill of mem_access Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 11:41 ` Matthew Auld
2024-01-09 17:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-09 18:27 ` Matthew Auld
2024-01-09 22:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-04 5:40 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for First attempt to kill mem_access Patchwork
2024-01-04 5:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-01-04 5:41 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-10 5:21 ` [RFC 00/20] " Matthew Brost
2024-01-10 14:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-10 14:08 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2024-01-10 14:33 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c1b0948-0a00-4881-af37-e47573687c0e@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox