Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	<matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	<vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	<karthik.poosa@intel.com>, <sk.anirban@intel.com>,
	<raag.jadav@intel.com>, <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>,
	<umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
	<dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>, <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Return error codes from sysctrl_wait_bit_set()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:26:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e4c1b8f-c826-459e-8202-04a2c883d213@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820101632.527214-11-mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>



On 8/20/2026 12:16 PM, Mallesh Koujalagi wrote:
> Make sysctrl_wait_bit_set() return an error code rather than a bool.
> and update callers to use xe_log_err() with the propagated error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>

with nits below fixed,

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> index ef847f0a8f2c..3523651b467b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> @@ -42,15 +42,11 @@ static int sysctrl_wait_bit_clear(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, u32 bit_mask,
>  				 timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
>  }
>  
> -static bool sysctrl_wait_bit_set(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> -				 unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +static int sysctrl_wait_bit_set(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> +				unsigned int timeout_ms)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = xe_mmio_wait32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> +	return xe_mmio_wait32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
>  			     timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);

is this correctly aligned?

> -
> -	return ret == 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int sysctrl_write_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, const void *frame,
> @@ -193,9 +189,10 @@ static int sysctrl_process_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, void *out,
>  	struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!sysctrl_wait_bit_set(sc, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, timeout_ms)) {
> -		xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Response frame timeout\n");
> -		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	ret = sysctrl_wait_bit_set(sc, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, timeout_ms);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		xe_log_err(xe, SYSCTRL, ret,  "Response frame timeout\n");
                                            ^^
double space

> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 10:16 [PATCH v4 0/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Clean up error handling in Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Return error codes from sysctrl_wait_bit_clear() Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:23   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Return error codes from sysctrl_wait_bit_set() Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:26   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Make sysctrl_write_frame() void Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:28   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Use xe_assert() for payload size validation Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:30   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Improve firmware response error logging Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:40   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Log group and command ID on mailbox failure Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:44   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] drm/xe/sysctrl: Report 'System Controller event' error using SIGID Mallesh Koujalagi
2026-08-20 22:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-20 10:25 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/sysctrl: Clean up error handling in Patchwork
2026-08-20 11:01 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-20 12:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e4c1b8f-c826-459e-8202-04a2c883d213@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
    --cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox