Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gupta, Varun" <varun.gupta@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/guc: rework exec queue teardown PM/unplug handling
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:59:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11b9d99a-0263-4a28-9288-67a16d145f3b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811133753.1742666-5-nitin.r.gote@intel.com>

On 11-Aug-26 7:07 PM, Nitin Gote wrote:
> The core_hotunplug "with-load" subtests trigger a "Missing outer runtime
> PM protection" warning when an exec queue is torn down from a deferred fd
> close after the device has been hot-unplugged:
>
>    guc_exec_queue_add_msg
>    guc_exec_queue_destroy
>    xe_exec_queue_destroy
>    xe_file_close
>
> The reference is not actually missing. On unplug the PCI core disables
> runtime PM (device_del() -> __pm_runtime_disable()) while the old
> drm_device is kept alive by the still-open fd. Once runtime PM is
> disabled pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() returns -EINVAL regardless of the
> usage count, so xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume() can no longer observe the
> held reference and warns.
Tested-by: Varun Gupta <varun.gupta@intel.com>
> drm_dev_unplug() always runs before runtime PM is disabled, so gate the
> message submission layer on the bound state instead of the PM reference:
>
>   - guc_exec_queue_add_msg(): only take the noresume PM reference while
>     drm_dev_enter() succeeds and record it in the message (MSG_PM_REF), so
>     the put in guc_exec_queue_process_msg() stays balanced.
>
>   - guc_exec_queue_process_msg(): re-check the bound state and skip each
>     handler's HW access once the device is gone.
>
>   - guc_exec_queue_destroy(): always post the CLEANUP message; the cleanup
>     handler issues the deregister H2G only while bound, registered, fw
>     running and not wedged, otherwise it tears down on the driver side.
>
> Also document the post-unplug PM-reference hazard in
> xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume().
>
> Observed with new IGT core_hotunplug subtests:
>    igt@core_hotunplug@hotreplug-with-load
>    igt@core_hotunplug@hotunplug-rescan-with-load
>
> v2:
>   - Drop the drm_dev_is_unplugged() bypass from guc_exec_queue_destroy()
>     and instead exclude hot-unplug from the WARN in
>     xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume().
>
> v3:
>   - Rework the fix in the message-submission layer instead of touching the
>     WARN; gate PM/HW work on drm_dev_enter() and route all queues through
>     the CLEANUP message. (Matthew Brost)
>   - Prove the root cause (runtime PM disabled on unplug, not a zero
>     refcount) and record it in the commit message. (Matt B, Raag)
>   - Also remove EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT flag in
>     separate patch (Matthew Brost)
>
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/725773/?series=166744&rev=4
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c         |  5 ++
>   2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 9036f89dff7d..80b69f7d0dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -1812,32 +1812,15 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct work_struct *w)
>   static void guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   {
>   	INIT_WORK(&q->guc->destroy_async, __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async);
> -
> -	/* We must block on kernel engines so slabs are empty on driver unload */
> -	if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT || exec_queue_wedged(q))
> -		guc_exec_queue_do_destroy(q);
> -	else
> -		xe_destroy_wq_queue(&q->guc->destroy_async);
> -}
> -
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Might be done from within the GPU scheduler, need to do async as we
> -	 * fini the scheduler when the engine is fini'd, the scheduler can't
> -	 * complete fini within itself (circular dependency). Async resolves
> -	 * this we and don't really care when everything is fini'd, just that it
> -	 * is.
> -	 */
> -	guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q);
> +	xe_destroy_wq_queue(&q->guc->destroy_async);
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +						 bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
>   
> -	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), !(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT));
>   	trace_xe_exec_queue_cleanup_entity(q);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1850,10 +1833,12 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   	 *   it is safe to directly destroy the exec queue on driver side, as the GuC
>   	 *   will not process further requests and all resources must be cleaned up locally.
>   	 */
> -	if (exec_queue_registered(q) && xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw))
> +	/* A wedged GuC won't answer the H2G, so tear down on the driver side. */
> +	if (bound && !exec_queue_wedged(q) && exec_queue_registered(q) &&
> +	    xe_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw))
>   		disable_scheduling_deregister(guc, q);
>   	else
> -		__guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
> +		guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q);
>   }
>   
>   static bool guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> @@ -1861,12 +1846,13 @@ static bool guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	return !exec_queue_killed_or_banned_or_wedged(q) && exec_queue_registered(q);
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +							 bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
>   
> -	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q))
> +	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound)
>   		init_policies(guc, q);
>   	kfree(msg);
>   }
> @@ -1904,13 +1890,14 @@ static void suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	__suspend_fence_signal(q);
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +						 bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
>   
>   	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && !exec_queue_suspended(q) &&
> -	    exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
> +	    exec_queue_enabled(q) && bound) {
>   		wait_event(guc->ct.wq, vf_recovery(guc) ||
>   			   ((q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
>   			   xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)));
> @@ -1934,11 +1921,12 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +						bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   
> -	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q)) {
> +	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound) {
>   		clear_exec_queue_suspended(q);
>   		if (!exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
>   			q->guc->resume_time = RESUME_PENDING;
> @@ -1950,17 +1938,19 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +								  bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   
> -	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q))
> +	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound)
>   		guc_exec_queue_send_cgp_sync(q, 0);
>   
>   	kfree(msg);
>   }
>   
> -static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> +static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
> +						  bool bound)
>   {
>   	struct xe_exec_queue *q = msg->private_data;
>   
> @@ -1969,7 +1959,7 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   	 * CGP update + CGP_SYNC (re-applies the current priority from
>   	 * q->multi_queue.priority).
>   	 */
> -	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q))
> +	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && bound)
>   		guc_exec_queue_send_cgp_sync(q, 0);
>   }
>   
> @@ -1982,37 +1972,45 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   #define OPCODE_MASK	0xf
>   #define MSG_LOCKED	BIT(8)
>   #define MSG_HEAD	BIT(9)
> +#define MSG_PM_REF	BIT(10)
>   
>   static void guc_exec_queue_process_msg(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   {
>   	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(msg->private_data));
> +	int idx;
> +	bool pm_ref = !!(msg->opcode & MSG_PM_REF);
> +	bool bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, &idx);
>   
>   	trace_xe_sched_msg_recv(msg);
>   
> -	switch (msg->opcode) {
> +	switch (msg->opcode & OPCODE_MASK) {
>   	case CLEANUP:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	case SET_SCHED_PROPS:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	case SUSPEND:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	case RESUME:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_resume(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	case SET_MULTI_QUEUE_PRIORITY:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_multi_queue_priority(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	case CGP_SYNC_MSG:
> -		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(msg);
> +		__guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cgp_sync(msg, bound);
>   		break;
>   	default:
>   		XE_WARN_ON("Unknown message type");
>   	}
>   
> -	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +	if (pm_ref)
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +	if (bound)
> +		drm_dev_exit(idx);
>   }
>   
>   static const struct drm_sched_backend_ops drm_sched_ops = {
> @@ -2137,10 +2135,16 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_kill(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   static void guc_exec_queue_add_msg(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_msg *msg,
>   				   u32 opcode)
>   {
> -	xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(q)));
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(exec_queue_to_guc(q));
> +	int idx;
> +	bool bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, &idx);
>   
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->link);
>   	msg->opcode = opcode & OPCODE_MASK;
> +	if (bound) {
> +		xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> +		msg->opcode |= MSG_PM_REF;
> +	}
>   	msg->private_data = q;
>   
>   	trace_xe_sched_msg_add(msg);
> @@ -2150,6 +2154,9 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_add_msg(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_sched_msg
>   		xe_sched_add_msg_locked(&q->guc->sched, msg);
>   	else
>   		xe_sched_add_msg(&q->guc->sched, msg);
> +
> +	if (bound)
> +		drm_dev_exit(idx);
>   }
>   
>   static void guc_exec_queue_try_add_msg_head(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> @@ -2182,10 +2189,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_destroy(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   {
>   	struct xe_sched_msg *msg = q->guc->static_msgs + STATIC_MSG_CLEANUP;
>   
> -	if (!(q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT) && !exec_queue_wedged(q))
> -		guc_exec_queue_add_msg(q, msg, CLEANUP);
> -	else
> -		__guc_exec_queue_destroy(exec_queue_to_guc(q), q);
> +	guc_exec_queue_add_msg(q, msg, CLEANUP);
>   }
>   
>   static int guc_exec_queue_set_priority(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> @@ -2650,7 +2654,7 @@ static void guc_exec_queue_stop(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (do_destroy)
> -		__guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
> +		guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q);
>   }
>   
>   static int guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> @@ -3296,7 +3300,7 @@ static void handle_deregister_done(struct xe_guc *guc, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	trace_xe_exec_queue_deregister_done(q);
>   
>   	clear_exec_queue_registered(q);
> -	__guc_exec_queue_destroy(guc, q);
> +	guc_exec_queue_destroy_async(q);
>   }
>   
>   int xe_guc_deregister_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index a5289a9df8d2..f517bf453b54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,11 @@ static bool xe_pm_suspending_or_resuming(struct xe_device *xe)
>    * break scope-based handling, or when the lifetime of the runtime PM reference
>    * does not match a specific scope (e.g., runtime PM obtained in one function
>    * and released in a different one).
> + *
> + * This helper assumes the caller already holds a runtime PM reference and
> + * only warns when it cannot see one. After hot-unplug runtime PM is disabled
> + * and the check fails even when a reference is held, so callers that may run
> + * after unplug must guard it with drm_dev_enter()/drm_dev_exit() instead.
>    */
>   void xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct xe_device *xe)
>   {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 13:37 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe/guc: handle exec queue teardown after hot-unplug Nitin Gote
2026-08-11 13:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-08-11 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/guc: rework exec queue teardown PM/unplug handling Nitin Gote
2026-08-13  6:46   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-19  5:29   ` Gupta, Varun [this message]
2026-08-19  6:18     ` Gote, Nitin R
2026-08-11 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: remove EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_PERMANENT Nitin Gote
2026-08-11 23:36   ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-13  6:40   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-11 13:45 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/xe/guc: handle exec queue teardown after hot-unplug Patchwork
2026-08-11 14:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-14  4:23   ` Gote, Nitin R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11b9d99a-0263-4a28-9288-67a16d145f3b@intel.com \
    --to=varun.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox