Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yadav, Arvind" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.brost@intel.com>, <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	<tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Keep scheduler timeline name alive
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:56:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13aa91ef-452d-411d-9bb5-0ca43ea169da@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f103d7b-3a58-4c3d-a4d7-e413e7b92e47@ursulin.net>


On 14-07-2026 15:02, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 14/07/2026 07:44, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> The scheduler keeps a pointer to the timeline name, but q->name
>> is freed with the exec queue while scheduler fences can still
>> reference it.
>>
>> Store the name in struct xe_guc_exec_queue so it shares
>> the scheduler's RCU-deferred lifetime.
>>
>> Fixes: 6bd90e700b42 ("drm/xe: Make dma-fences compliant with the safe 
>> access rules")
>
> Feel free to copy me if I broke something, or even fixed it 
> incompletely. :)
>
> It is curious since I had an IGT which confirmed the fix was effective 
> by dereferencing the timeline.
>
> At the time of the above commit:
>
> __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup
>   __guc_exec_queue_fini
>     guc_exec_queue_fini_async
>     ...
>         xe_sched_entity_fini
>         xe_sched_fini
>         kfree_rcu ge
>         xe_exec_queue_fini q
>           __xe_exec_queue_free
>            kfree q
>
>
> Now:
>
> __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_cleanup
>   __guc_exec_queue_destroy
>     guc_exec_queue_destroy_async
>       __guc_exec_queue_destroy_async
>         xe_exec_queue_fini
>       __xe_exec_queue_fini
>             guc_exec_queue_fini
>             ...
>               xe_sched_entity_fini
>               xe_sched_fini
>               kfree_rcu ge
>       __xe_exec_queue_free
>               kfree q
>
> Looks functionally identical.
>
> AFAIR the problem actually was:
>
> drm_sched_fence_get_timeline_name()
>   return (const char *)fence->sched->name;
>
> Where fence->sched is drm sched, aka "ge" from the above flow.
>
> And that has kfree_rcu in the today's code base too. So no issue with 
> the sched pointer itself.
>
> What about sched->name ie. q->name? It is only free after the 
> scheduler is freed, so after the RCU grace, and if scheduler itself is 
> unreachable then sched->name is surely unreachable too.
>
> What am I missing? Could you provide some details on where and how 
> this crashes?
>
Thanks Tvrtko,

The gap is in the lifetime of sched->name, not fence->sched. 
drm_sched_init() stores the name as a pointer. it does not copy it. 
Today that pointer refers to q->name, which is embedded in struct 
xe_exec_queue.

The teardown order is:
         kfree_rcu(ge)    // scheduler remains valid until the RCU grace 
period
         kfree(q)         // q->name is freed immediately

So during the RCU grace period, fence->sched is still valid, but 
fence->sched->name points into the already freed q. The patch moves the 
name storage into ge, so the scheduler and its name share the same 
RCU-deferred lifetime.

this issue is pointed by sashiko -: 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713042530.2108459-1-arvind.yadav%40intel.com

Regards,
Arvind


> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h | 5 +++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c           | 4 +++-
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
>> index e5e53b421f29..cda14d954e57 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>     #include "xe_gpu_scheduler_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_hw_fence_types.h"
>>     struct dma_fence;
>>   struct xe_exec_queue;
>> @@ -24,6 +25,10 @@ struct xe_guc_exec_queue {
>>       struct rcu_head rcu;
>>       /** @sched: GPU scheduler for this xe_exec_queue */
>>       struct xe_gpu_scheduler sched;
>> +    /**
>> +     * @name: Scheduler timeline name, kept with @sched until RCU free.
>> +     */
>> +    char name[MAX_FENCE_NAME_LEN];
>>       /** @entity: Scheduler entity for this xe_exec_queue */
>>       struct xe_sched_entity entity;
>>       /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> index cec3bbf3a10e..8ef6eeebfaa8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
>> @@ -1978,6 +1978,8 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct 
>> xe_exec_queue *q)
>>         xe_exec_queue_assign_name(q, q->guc->id);
>>   +    strscpy(ge->name, q->name, sizeof(ge->name));
>> +
>>       /*
>>        * Use primary queue's submit_wq for all secondary queues of a
>>        * multi queue group. This serialization avoids any locking around
>> @@ -1992,7 +1994,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct 
>> xe_exec_queue *q)
>>       err = xe_sched_init(&ge->sched, &drm_sched_ops, &xe_sched_ops,
>>                   submit_wq, xe_lrc_ring_size() / MAX_JOB_SIZE_BYTES, 
>> 64,
>>                   timeout, guc_to_gt(guc)->ordered_wq, NULL,
>> -                q->name, gt_to_xe(q->gt)->drm.dev);
>> +                ge->name, gt_to_xe(q->gt)->drm.dev);
>>       if (err)
>>           goto err_release_id;
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14  6:44 [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Keep scheduler timeline name alive Arvind Yadav
2026-07-14  8:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-07-14  9:32 ` [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-15  4:26   ` Yadav, Arvind [this message]
2026-07-15  7:49     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-15  7:54       ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-15  8:09         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-07-14 12:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13aa91ef-452d-411d-9bb5-0ca43ea169da@intel.com \
    --to=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox