From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Add xe_ggtt_node_addr() to avoid dereferencing xe_ggtt_node
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:15:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15bc327f-275a-4b03-8ce9-e69e29237d82@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021121814.2193153-12-dev@lankhorst.se>
On 10/21/2025 2:18 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This function makes it possible to add an offset that is applied to
> all xe_ggtt_node's, and hides the internals from all its users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 8 +++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> index 911d5b90461a2..9c3f0ebaa1554 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
>
> #include "xe_bo_types.h"
> +#include "xe_ggtt.h"
> #include "xe_macros.h"
> #include "xe_validation.h"
> #include "xe_vm_types.h"
> @@ -251,13 +252,14 @@ static inline u32
> __xe_bo_ggtt_addr(struct xe_bo *bo, u8 tile_id)
> {
> struct xe_ggtt_node *ggtt_node = bo->ggtt_node[tile_id];
> + u64 offset;
>
> if (XE_WARN_ON(!ggtt_node))
> return 0;
>
> - XE_WARN_ON(ggtt_node->base.size > xe_bo_size(bo));
> - XE_WARN_ON(ggtt_node->base.start + ggtt_node->base.size > (1ull << 32));
> - return ggtt_node->base.start;
> + offset = xe_ggtt_node_addr(ggtt_node);
> + XE_WARN_ON(offset + xe_bo_size(bo) > (1ull << 32));
maybe better to use U32_MAX and convert to:
xe_assert(xe_bo_device(bo), offset + xe_bo_size(bo) <= U32_MAX);
or at least to xe-oriented:
xe_WARN_ON(xe_bo_device(bo), offset + xe_bo_size(bo) > U32_MAX);
and what about checking bo_size vs node_size ?
> + return offset;
> }
>
> static inline u32
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> index 42e3caa3a6d9c..05515037e2d6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c
> @@ -1079,3 +1079,14 @@ u64 xe_ggtt_read_pte(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 offset)
> {
> return ioread64(ggtt->gsm + (offset / XE_PAGE_SIZE));
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_ggtt_node_addr - Get @node offset in GGTT.
> + * @node: &xe_ggtt_node
> + *
> + * Get the GGTT offset for allocated node.
> + */
> +u64 xe_ggtt_node_addr(const struct xe_ggtt_node *node)
> +{
we can also have here:
xe_ggtt_assert_fit(node->ggtt, node->base.start, node->base.size);
> + return node->base.start;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> index d54a2ae2b4aa8..4a8ef1b824156 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
> @@ -58,4 +58,6 @@ void xe_ggtt_might_lock(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt);
> u64 xe_ggtt_encode_pte_flags(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, struct xe_bo *bo, u16 pat_index);
> u64 xe_ggtt_read_pte(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 offset);
>
> +u64 xe_ggtt_node_addr(const struct xe_ggtt_node *node);
nit: shouldn't we keep "node" related functions together ?
> +
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 12:18 [PATCH 0/7] drm/xe: Privatize struct xe_ggtt_node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Start using ggtt->start in preparation of balloon removal Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Convert xe_fb_pin to use a callback for insertion into GGTT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Add xe_ggtt_node_addr() to avoid dereferencing xe_ggtt_node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 13:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-10-21 13:48 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe/display: Avoid " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Do not dereference ggtt_node in xe_bo.c Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe: Improve xe_gt_sriov_pf_config GGTT handling Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 12:46 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Privatize xe_ggtt_node Maarten Lankhorst
2025-10-21 13:49 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Privatize struct xe_ggtt_node Patchwork
2025-10-21 13:50 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15bc327f-275a-4b03-8ce9-e69e29237d82@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox