From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Ankit Nautiyal" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gmbus: Add Wa_16025573575 for PTL for bit-bashing
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 10:11:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175146190758.3748.7583185864302070157@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702084620.3837426-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Quoting Ankit Nautiyal (2025-07-02 05:46:19-03:00)
>As per Wa_16025573575 for PTL, set the GPIO masks bit before starting
>bit-bashing and maintain value through the bit-bashing sequence.
>After bit-bashing sequence is done, clear the GPIO masks bits.
>
>v2:
>-Use new helper for display workarounds. (Jani)
>-Use a separate if-block for the workaround. (Gustavo)
>
>Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c | 7 ++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>index f5e8d58d9a68..12d1df5981f7 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>@@ -42,11 +42,18 @@ void intel_display_wa_apply(struct intel_display *display)
> gen11_display_wa_apply(display);
> }
>
>+static bool intel_display_needs_wa_16025573575(struct intel_display *display)
>+{
>+ return DISPLAY_VER(display) == 30;
We should also check for 30.02.
>+}
>+
> bool __intel_display_wa(struct intel_display *display, enum intel_display_wa wa)
> {
> switch (wa) {
> case INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16023588340:
> return intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(display);
>+ case INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16025573575:
>+ return intel_display_needs_wa_16025573575(display);
While it makes sense to have function
intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340() (at least for now), I wonder if the
same could be said about intel_display_needs_wa_16025573575()...
Maybe it would be simpler to just inline the conditions with a single
line here instead of adding 5 extra lines to the file.
--
Gustavo Sousa
> default:
> drm_WARN(display->drm, 1, "Missing Wa number: %d\n", wa);
> break;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>index 146ee70d66f7..d3d241992e55 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ bool intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(struct intel_display *display);
>
> enum intel_display_wa {
> INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16023588340,
>+ INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16025573575,
> };
>
> bool __intel_display_wa(struct intel_display *display, enum intel_display_wa wa);
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>index 0d73f32fe7f1..95cab11c9cde 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_regs.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>+#include "intel_display_wa.h"
> #include "intel_gmbus.h"
> #include "intel_gmbus_regs.h"
>
>@@ -241,11 +242,18 @@ static u32 get_reserved(struct intel_gmbus *bus)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = bus->display;
> u32 reserved = 0;
>+ u32 preserve_bits = 0;
>
> /* On most chips, these bits must be preserved in software. */
> if (!display->platform.i830 && !display->platform.i845g)
>- reserved = intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg) &
>- (GPIO_DATA_PULLUP_DISABLE | GPIO_CLOCK_PULLUP_DISABLE);
>+ preserve_bits |= GPIO_DATA_PULLUP_DISABLE | GPIO_CLOCK_PULLUP_DISABLE;
>+
>+ /* PTL: Wa_16025573575: the masks bits need to be preserved through out */
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ preserve_bits |= GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_MASK | GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_MASK |
>+ GPIO_DATA_DIR_MASK | GPIO_DATA_VAL_MASK;
>+
>+ reserved = intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg) & preserve_bits;
>
> return reserved;
> }
>@@ -308,6 +316,22 @@ static void set_data(void *data, int state_high)
> intel_de_posting_read(display, bus->gpio_reg);
> }
>
>+static void
>+ptl_handle_mask_bits(struct intel_gmbus *bus, bool set)
>+{
>+ struct intel_display *display = bus->display;
>+ u32 reg_val = intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg);
>+ u32 mask_bits = GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_MASK | GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_MASK |
>+ GPIO_DATA_DIR_MASK | GPIO_DATA_VAL_MASK;
>+ if (set)
>+ reg_val |= mask_bits;
>+ else
>+ reg_val &= ~mask_bits;
>+
>+ intel_de_write_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg, reg_val);
>+ intel_de_posting_read(display, bus->gpio_reg);
>+}
>+
> static int
> intel_gpio_pre_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> {
>@@ -319,6 +343,9 @@ intel_gpio_pre_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> if (display->platform.pineview)
> pnv_gmbus_clock_gating(display, false);
>
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ ptl_handle_mask_bits(bus, true);
>+
> set_data(bus, 1);
> set_clock(bus, 1);
> udelay(I2C_RISEFALL_TIME);
>@@ -336,6 +363,9 @@ intel_gpio_post_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>
> if (display->platform.pineview)
> pnv_gmbus_clock_gating(display, true);
>+
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ ptl_handle_mask_bits(bus, false);
> }
>
> static void
>--
>2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 8:46 [PATCH 0/2] Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-02 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display_wa: Add helpers to check wa Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-02 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-02 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-02 14:12 ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-03 6:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-02 19:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-07-02 20:25 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-07-02 21:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-07-02 21:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-07-03 9:30 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-03 12:14 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-03 13:51 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-07-03 12:08 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-03 13:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-07-03 14:44 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-02 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gmbus: Add Wa_16025573575 for PTL for bit-bashing Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-02 13:11 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-07-03 6:05 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-03 12:16 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-02 9:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 (rev2) Patchwork
2025-07-02 10:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-04 1:16 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-30 5:49 [PATCH 0/2] Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-06-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gmbus: Add Wa_16025573575 for PTL for bit-bashing Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175146190758.3748.7583185864302070157@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox