From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Ankit Nautiyal" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gmbus: Add Wa_16025573575 for PTL/WCL for bit-bashing
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:56:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175259499067.1809.11312877925739565990@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715142211.3145299-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Quoting Ankit Nautiyal (2025-07-15 11:22:11-03:00)
>As per Wa_16025573575 for PTL/WCL, set the GPIO masks bit before starting
>bit-bashing and maintain value through the bit-bashing sequence. After the
>bit-bashing sequence is done, clear the GPIO masks bits.
>
>v2:
>-Use new helper for display workarounds. (Jani)
>-Use a separate if-block for the workaround. (Gustavo)
>
>v3:
>-Document the workaround details in intel_display_wa.c
>-Extend the workaround to WCL too. (Gustavo)
>
>v4:
>-Fix the platform check. (Gustavo)
>-Avoid read when preserve bits are 0. (Gustavo)
>
>Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
>---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c | 12 ++++++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>index 32719e2c6025..399c08902413 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.c
>@@ -42,11 +42,23 @@ void intel_display_wa_apply(struct intel_display *display)
> gen11_display_wa_apply(display);
> }
>
>+/*
>+ * Wa_16025573575:
>+ * Fixes: Issue with bitbashing on Xe3 based platforms.
>+ * Workaround: Set masks bits in GPIO CTL and preserve it during bitbashing sequence.
>+ */
>+static bool intel_display_needs_wa_16025573575(struct intel_display *display)
>+{
>+ return DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 3000 || DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 3002;
>+}
>+
> bool __intel_display_wa(struct intel_display *display, enum intel_display_wa wa, const char *name)
> {
> switch (wa) {
> case INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16023588340:
> return intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(display);
>+ case INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16025573575:
>+ return intel_display_needs_wa_16025573575(display);
> default:
> drm_WARN(display->drm, 1, "Missing Wa number: %s\n", name);
> break;
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>index 8319e16eb460..aedea4cfa3ce 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_wa.h
>@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ bool intel_display_needs_wa_16023588340(struct intel_display *display);
>
> enum intel_display_wa {
> INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16023588340,
>+ INTEL_DISPLAY_WA_16025573575,
> };
>
> bool __intel_display_wa(struct intel_display *display, enum intel_display_wa wa, const char *name);
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>index 0d73f32fe7f1..637f0f23f163 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
>@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_regs.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>+#include "intel_display_wa.h"
> #include "intel_gmbus.h"
> #include "intel_gmbus_regs.h"
>
>@@ -240,14 +241,20 @@ static void bxt_gmbus_clock_gating(struct intel_display *display,
> static u32 get_reserved(struct intel_gmbus *bus)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = bus->display;
>- u32 reserved = 0;
>+ u32 preserve_bits = 0;
>+
>+ if (display->platform.i830 || display->platform.i845g)
>+ return 0;
>
> /* On most chips, these bits must be preserved in software. */
>- if (!display->platform.i830 && !display->platform.i845g)
>- reserved = intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg) &
>- (GPIO_DATA_PULLUP_DISABLE | GPIO_CLOCK_PULLUP_DISABLE);
>+ preserve_bits |= GPIO_DATA_PULLUP_DISABLE | GPIO_CLOCK_PULLUP_DISABLE;
>+
>+ /* Wa_16025573575: the masks bits need to be preserved through out */
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ preserve_bits |= GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_MASK | GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_MASK |
>+ GPIO_DATA_DIR_MASK | GPIO_DATA_VAL_MASK;
>
>- return reserved;
>+ return intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg) & preserve_bits;
> }
>
> static int get_clock(void *data)
>@@ -308,6 +315,22 @@ static void set_data(void *data, int state_high)
> intel_de_posting_read(display, bus->gpio_reg);
> }
>
>+static void
>+ptl_handle_mask_bits(struct intel_gmbus *bus, bool set)
>+{
>+ struct intel_display *display = bus->display;
>+ u32 reg_val = intel_de_read_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg);
>+ u32 mask_bits = GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_MASK | GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_MASK |
>+ GPIO_DATA_DIR_MASK | GPIO_DATA_VAL_MASK;
>+ if (set)
>+ reg_val |= mask_bits;
>+ else
>+ reg_val &= ~mask_bits;
>+
>+ intel_de_write_notrace(display, bus->gpio_reg, reg_val);
>+ intel_de_posting_read(display, bus->gpio_reg);
>+}
>+
> static int
> intel_gpio_pre_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> {
>@@ -319,6 +342,9 @@ intel_gpio_pre_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> if (display->platform.pineview)
> pnv_gmbus_clock_gating(display, false);
>
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ ptl_handle_mask_bits(bus, true);
>+
> set_data(bus, 1);
> set_clock(bus, 1);
> udelay(I2C_RISEFALL_TIME);
>@@ -336,6 +362,9 @@ intel_gpio_post_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>
> if (display->platform.pineview)
> pnv_gmbus_clock_gating(display, true);
>+
>+ if (intel_display_wa(display, 16025573575))
>+ ptl_handle_mask_bits(bus, false);
> }
>
> static void
>--
>2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 4:18 [PATCH 0/2] Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-11 4:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display_wa: Add helpers to check wa Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-16 14:18 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-11 4:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gmbus: Add Wa_16025573575 for PTL/WCL for bit-bashing Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-11 11:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-07-15 3:22 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-15 14:22 ` Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-15 15:56 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-07-11 4:38 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 (rev3) Patchwork
2025-07-11 5:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-11 12:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-07-15 15:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 (rev4) Patchwork
2025-07-15 16:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-15 22:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-07-17 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] Introduce helper for display workarounds and add Wa_16025573575 Nautiyal, Ankit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175259499067.1809.11312877925739565990@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox