From: "Ghimiray, Himal Prasad" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: Add CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 22:00:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b3fa46f-8aca-46ee-bee9-2465881f98e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNzx/8KeURxfO8ue@nvishwa1-DESK>
Hi Niranjana,
On 16-08-2023 21:27, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:18:12PM +0530, Ghimiray, Himal Prasad wrote:
>> Hi Niranjana,
>>
>> On 16-08-2023 17:22, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>
>> Allow preemption timeout to be specified as a config option.
>>
>> v2: Change unit to microseconds (Tejas)
>> v3: Remove get_default_preempt_timeout()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura
>> <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile | 11 +++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c | 5 ++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
>> index 9ad487647ca1..a3655ee6978e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.profile
>> @@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ config DRM_XE_TIMESLICE_MIN
>> help
>> Configures the default min timeslice duration between multiple
>> contexts by guc scheduling.
>> +config DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT
>> + int "Preempt timeout (us, jiffy granularity)"
>> + default 640000 # microseconds
>> + help
>> + How long to wait (in microseconds) for a preemption event
>> to occur
>> + when submitting a new context. If the current context does
>> not hit
>> + an arbitration point and yield to HW before the timer
>> expires, the
>> + HW will be reset to allow the more important context to
>> execute.
>> +
>> + Value should be within the DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN/MAX
>> limits.
>>
>> Is there plan to make this config dependent on
>> CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN/CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MAX ?
>>
>
> No, it can be independently set. The _MIN and _MAX can also be
> independently set.
If they can be independently set we can have scenario where there is no
DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN/MAX limits
and above statement "Value should be within the
DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN/MAX limits" becomes somewhat wrong.
>
>> If not, value should be within
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN/XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MAX.
>>
>
> Yes, the patch includes a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure that.
Yes that is correct. I had only pointed this from description in Kconfig
perspective.
BR
Himal Ghimiray
>
>> + This is adjustable via
>> XE_ENGINE_SET_PROPERTY_PREEMPTION_TIMEOUT.
>>
>> If IIRC ioctl calls names are changed from XE_ENGINE_* to
>> XE_EXEC_QUUEUE_*. Please confirm.
>>
>> And this statement seems misleading, ioctl call will set the
>> properties
>> for specific exec_queue and config is meant to be for all exec_queues
>> unless changed by ioctl.
>>
>> IMO better description will be "preemption property for exec_queue
>> can be
>> adjusted by XE_EXEC_QUEUE_SET_PROPERTY_PREEMPTION_TIMEOUT" or we
>> can skip
>> this
>>
>> info altogether in kconfig because ioctl description might be already
>> covering it.
>>
>
> Yah, the for to change the name from Xe_ENGINE* to XE_EXEC_QUEUE.
> Yah, makes sense to remove that line altogether. Will post a fixup patch.
>
> Niranajna
>
>> BR
>>
>> Himal Ghimiray
>>
>> config DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MAX
>> int "Default max preempt timeout (us)"
>> default 10000000 # microseconds
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
>> index c44540684462..4c812d04e182 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
>> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void hw_engine_init_early(struct xe_gt
>> *gt, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe,
>> hwe->eclass->sched_props.timeslice_us = 1 * 1000;
>> hwe->eclass->sched_props.timeslice_min =
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_TIMESLICE_MIN;
>> hwe->eclass->sched_props.timeslice_max =
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_TIMESLICE_MAX;
>> - hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us = 640 * 1000;
>> + hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_us =
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT;
>> hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_min =
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN;
>> hwe->eclass->sched_props.preempt_timeout_max =
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MAX;
>> /* Record default props */
>> @@ -562,6 +562,9 @@ int xe_hw_engines_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt)
>> read_copy_fuses(gt);
>> read_compute_fuses(gt);
>>
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT <
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN);
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT >
>> XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MAX);
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gt->hw_engines); i++)
>> hw_engine_init_early(gt, >->hw_engines[i], i);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
>> index 3d37d6d44261..71968ee2f600 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ struct drm_printer;
>> #else
>> #define XE_HW_ENGINE_TIMESLICE_MAX (10 * 1000 * 1000)
>> #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT
>> +#define XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT
>> +#else
>> +#define XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT (640 * 1000)
>> +#endif
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN
>> #define XE_HW_ENGINE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN
>> CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT_MIN
>> #else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 11:52 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-08-16 11:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/xe: Simplify engine class sched_props setting Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-08-16 11:52 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/xe: Add CONFIG_DRM_XE_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-08-16 13:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2023-08-16 15:48 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
2023-08-16 15:57 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-08-16 16:30 ` Ghimiray, Himal Prasad [this message]
2023-08-16 16:41 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2023-08-16 13:05 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Add preemption timeout config options Patchwork
2023-08-16 13:05 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-16 13:06 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-08-16 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-08-16 13:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-08-16 13:11 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1b3fa46f-8aca-46ee-bee9-2465881f98e3@intel.com \
--to=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox