Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, maarten.lankhorst@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/7] drm/xe: Generalize fake device creation
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:05:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230321220527.595462-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230321220527.595462-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

Instead of requiring tests to initialize a fake device an keep it in
sync with xe_pci.c when it's platform-dependent, export a function from
xe_pci.c to be used and piggy back on the device info creation. This
migrates the xe_rtp tests to use this new helper.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h | 16 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c | 11 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c            |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
index 643bddb35214..81723b8c3aef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
@@ -60,3 +60,49 @@ int xe_call_for_each_device(xe_device_fn xe_fn)
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_platform platform,
+			    enum xe_subplatform subplatform)
+{
+	const struct pci_device_id *ent = pciidlist;
+	const struct xe_device_desc *desc;
+	const struct xe_subplatform_desc *subplatform_desc;
+
+	if (platform == XE_TEST_PLATFORM_ANY) {
+		desc = (const void *)ent->driver_data;
+		subplatform_desc = NULL;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	for (ent = pciidlist; ent->device; ent++) {
+		desc = (const void *)ent->driver_data;
+		if (desc->platform == platform)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (!ent->device)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (subplatform == XE_TEST_SUBPLATFORM_ANY) {
+		subplatform_desc = desc->subplatforms;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	for (subplatform_desc = desc->subplatforms;
+	     subplatform_desc && subplatform_desc->subplatform;
+	     subplatform_desc++)
+		if (subplatform_desc->subplatform == subplatform)
+			break;
+
+	if (subplatform == XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE && subplatform_desc)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (subplatform != XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE && !subplatform_desc)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+done:
+	xe_info_init(xe, desc, subplatform_desc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(xe_pci_fake_device_init, XE_KUNIT);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
index de65d8c9ccb5..43294e8c62bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
@@ -6,10 +6,26 @@
 #ifndef _XE_PCI_TEST_H_
 #define _XE_PCI_TEST_H_
 
+#include "xe_platform_types.h"
+
 struct xe_device;
 
+/*
+ * Some defines just for clarity: these mean the test doesn't care about what
+ * platform it will get since it doesn't depend on any platform-specific bits
+ */
+#define XE_TEST_PLATFORM_ANY	XE_PLATFORM_UNINITIALIZED
+#define XE_TEST_SUBPLATFORM_ANY	XE_SUBPLATFORM_UNINITIALIZED
+
 typedef int (*xe_device_fn)(struct xe_device *);
 
 int xe_call_for_each_device(xe_device_fn xe_fn);
 
+int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_platform platform,
+			    enum xe_subplatform subplatform);
+
+#define xe_pci_fake_device_init_any(xe__)					\
+	xe_pci_fake_device_init(xe__, XE_TEST_PLATFORM_ANY,			\
+				XE_TEST_SUBPLATFORM_ANY)
+
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
index bb633dd09a76..37d3cd1a43fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
@@ -11,16 +11,13 @@
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 
 #include "xe_device_types.h"
-
-static void xe_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	xe->gt[0].xe = xe;
-}
+#include "xe_pci_test.h"
 
 static int xe_rtp_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe;
 	struct device *dev;
+	int ret;
 
 	dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
@@ -30,7 +27,9 @@ static int xe_rtp_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 					       drm, DRIVER_GEM);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, xe);
 
-	xe_fake_device_init(xe);
+	ret = xe_pci_fake_device_init_any(xe);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
 	xe->drm.dev = dev;
 	test->priv = xe;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
index 302f7f588da1..21ae5e6f8fe5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void xe_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 
 static int xe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
-	const struct xe_device_desc *desc = (void *)ent->driver_data;
+	const struct xe_device_desc *desc = (const void *)ent->driver_data;
 	const struct xe_subplatform_desc *subplatform_desc;
 	struct xe_device *xe;
 	int err;
-- 
2.39.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-21 22:05 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/7] Unit tests for rtp and GT wa/tuning Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/7] drm/xe: Add basic unit tests for rtp Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-27 17:56   ` Michał Winiarski
2023-03-31 13:43     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-01  8:59       ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-01 18:54         ` Michał Winiarski
2023-04-02  1:24           ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-02 10:51             ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-03-31 14:34     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-01  8:54       ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-01 18:26         ` Michał Winiarski
2023-04-02  1:34           ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-02 11:17             ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-04-02 21:54               ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-03  7:38                 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-04-03 13:02                   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/7] drm/xe: Extract function to initialize xe->info Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/7] drm/xe: Move test infra out of xe_pci.[ch] Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/7] drm/xe: Use XE_KUNIT for symbol namespace Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 6/7] drm/xe/reg_sr: Save errors for kunit integration Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-27 18:29   ` Michał Winiarski
2023-03-31 14:43     ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe: Add test for GT workarounds and tunings Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-21 22:08 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Unit tests for rtp and GT wa/tuning Patchwork
2023-03-31 15:14   ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-03  6:08     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-03-21 22:09 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-03-21 22:13 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-03-21 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230321220527.595462-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox