From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: Clear the buffer object bulk move at individualize time
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 17:02:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230525150205.194098-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230525150205.194098-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Clearing the buffer object bulk move is closely tied to individualizing
the resv, since that is when we effectively detach the bo from a vm.
Clearing the bulk move also requires the bo resv, which we have readily
locked at individualizing time without clobbering the much wider vm
lock.
So Clear the buffer object bulk_move at individualizing time, and update
the code comments.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index bd5dae4d1624..57cc9f845adc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -193,20 +193,33 @@ static int ttm_bo_individualize_resv(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
BUG_ON(!dma_resv_trylock(&bo->base._resv));
r = dma_resv_copy_fences(&bo->base._resv, bo->base.resv);
- dma_resv_unlock(&bo->base._resv);
- if (r)
- return r;
- if (bo->type != ttm_bo_type_sg) {
- /* This works because the BO is about to be destroyed and nobody
- * reference it any more. The only tricky case is the trylock on
- * the resv object while holding the lru_lock.
+ if (!r && bo->type != ttm_bo_type_sg) {
+ /*
+ * The TTM bo refcount is now zero and hence nobody will
+ * therefore try to lock the bo at this point: the LRU
+ * list lookups will trylock even if the refcount is zero,
+ * but will only do that under the LRU lock and will
+ * then immediately back off under the same LRU lock when it
+ * sees the zero refcount.
*/
spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
bo->base.resv = &bo->base._resv;
+
+ /* Since bulk move is closely tied with the shared resv,
+ * clear it when we have now individualized, if that was not
+ * done by the driver already.
+ */
+ if (bo->bulk_move) {
+ if (bo->resource)
+ ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
+ bo->bulk_move = NULL;
+ }
spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
}
+ dma_resv_unlock(&bo->base._resv);
+
return r;
}
@@ -324,7 +337,6 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
int ret;
WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->pin_count);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->bulk_move);
if (!bo->deleted) {
ret = ttm_bo_individualize_resv(bo);
@@ -337,6 +349,8 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
30 * HZ);
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->bulk_move);
+
if (bo->bdev->funcs->release_notify)
bo->bdev->funcs->release_notify(bo);
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-25 15:02 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/3] drm/ttm: Reservation object individualization update Thomas Hellström
2023-05-25 15:02 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2023-06-01 10:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: Clear the buffer object bulk move at individualize time Christian König
2023-05-25 15:02 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/ttm: Clean up bo individualizing somewhat Thomas Hellström
2023-05-25 15:02 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm: Use a define for the resv wait timeout Thomas Hellström
2023-05-25 15:04 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/ttm: Reservation object individualization update Patchwork
2023-05-25 15:06 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-05-25 15:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-05-25 15:39 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230525150205.194098-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox