Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:18:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230615181840.76075-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)

When moving between PL_VRAM <-> PL_SYSTEM we have to have use PL_TT in
the middle as a temporary resource for the actual copy. In some GL
workloads it can be seen that once the resource has been moved to the
PL_TT we might have to bail out of the ttm_bo_validate(), before
finishing the final hop. If this happens the resource is left as
TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY, and when the ttm_bo_validate() is restarted the
current placement is always seen as incompatible, requiring us to
complete the move.  However if the BO allows PL_TT as a possible
placement we can end up attempting a PL_TT -> PL_TT move (like when
running out of VRAM) which leads to explosions in xe_bo_move(), like
triggering the XE_BUG_ON(!tile).

Going from TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY with PL_TT -> PL_VRAM should already
work as-is, so it looks like we only need to worry about PL_TT -> PL_TT
and it looks like we can just treat it as a dummy move, since no real
move is needed.

Reported-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index b94a80a32d86..5aed626cce80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -603,6 +603,16 @@ static int xe_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo, bool evict,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Failed multi-hop where the old_mem is still marked as
+	 * TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY, should just be a dummy move.
+	 */
+	if (old_mem->mem_type == XE_PL_TT &&
+	    new_mem->mem_type == XE_PL_TT) {
+		ttm_bo_move_null(ttm_bo, new_mem);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (!move_lacks_source && !xe_bo_is_pinned(bo)) {
 		ret = xe_bo_move_notify(bo, ctx);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-06-15 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-15 18:18 Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-06-15 18:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/bo: handle PL_TT -> PL_TT Patchwork
2023-06-15 18:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-06-15 18:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-06-15 18:33 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-06-15 18:34 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-06-15 18:35 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-06-15 19:04 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-06-16 15:47 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH] " Thomas Hellström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230615181840.76075-1-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox