From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: add missing bulk_move reset
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230713094125.326709-8-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713094125.326709-5-matthew.auld@intel.com>
It looks like bulk_move is set during object construction, but is only
removed on object close, however in various places we might not yet have
an actual fd to close, like on the error paths for the gem_create ioctl,
and also one internal user for the evict_test_run_gt() selftest. Try to
handle those cases by manually resetting the bulk_move. This should
prevent triggering:
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 8252 at drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:327
ttm_bo_release+0x25e/0x2a0 [ttm]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
index 21c6dfef8dc7..1a5b48d60c80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c
@@ -285,6 +285,10 @@ static int evict_test_run_gt(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_gt *gt, struct kuni
xe_bo_unlock(external, &ww);
xe_bo_put(external);
+
+ xe_bo_lock(bo, &ww, 0, false);
+ __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(bo);
+ xe_bo_unlock(bo, &ww);
xe_bo_put(bo);
continue;
@@ -295,6 +299,9 @@ static int evict_test_run_gt(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_gt *gt, struct kuni
cleanup_external:
xe_bo_put(external);
cleanup_bo:
+ xe_bo_lock(bo, &ww, 0, false);
+ __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(bo);
+ xe_bo_unlock(bo, &ww);
xe_bo_put(bo);
break;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 6353afa8d846..2ce09ae1d614 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -1317,6 +1317,8 @@ xe_bo_create_locked_range(struct xe_device *xe,
return bo;
err_unlock_put_bo:
+ if (vm)
+ __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(bo);
xe_bo_unlock_vm_held(bo);
xe_bo_put(bo);
return ERR_PTR(err);
@@ -1760,22 +1762,29 @@ int xe_gem_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
bo_flags |= args->flags << (ffs(XE_BO_CREATE_SYSTEM_BIT) - 1);
bo = xe_bo_create(xe, NULL, vm, args->size, ttm_bo_type_device,
bo_flags);
- if (vm) {
- xe_vm_unlock(vm, &ww);
- xe_vm_put(vm);
+ if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(bo);
+ goto out_vm;
}
- if (IS_ERR(bo))
- return PTR_ERR(bo);
-
err = drm_gem_handle_create(file, &bo->ttm.base, &handle);
- xe_bo_put(bo);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out_bulk;
args->handle = handle;
+ goto out_put;
- return 0;
+out_bulk:
+ if (vm)
+ __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(bo);
+out_put:
+ xe_bo_put(bo);
+out_vm:
+ if (vm) {
+ xe_vm_unlock(vm, &ww);
+ xe_vm_put(vm);
+ }
+ return err;
}
int xe_gem_mmap_offset_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
index 08ca1d06bf77..72c68facd481 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
@@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ static inline void xe_bo_put(struct xe_bo *bo)
drm_gem_object_put(&bo->ttm.base);
}
+static inline void __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(struct xe_bo *bo)
+{
+ if (bo)
+ ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&bo->ttm, NULL);
+}
+
static inline void xe_bo_assert_held(struct xe_bo *bo)
{
if (bo)
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-13 9:41 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] drm/xe/selftests: hold rpm for evict_test_run_device() Matthew Auld
2023-07-13 9:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/xe/selftests: hold rpm for ccs_test_migrate() Matthew Auld
2023-07-13 15:24 ` Nirmoy Das
2023-07-13 9:41 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/selftests: restart GT after xe_bo_restore_kernel() Matthew Auld
2023-07-13 15:34 ` Nirmoy Das
2023-07-13 9:41 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-07-13 16:05 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] drm/xe: add missing bulk_move reset Nirmoy Das
2023-07-14 9:02 ` Matthew Auld
2023-07-13 10:37 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/4] drm/xe/selftests: hold rpm for evict_test_run_device() Patchwork
2023-07-13 10:37 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2023-07-13 10:39 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-07-13 10:43 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-07-13 10:43 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-07-13 10:44 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-07-13 15:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] " Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230713094125.326709-8-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox