Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "FIXME: drm/i915: runtime pm changes"
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:00:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230918070100.1387082-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230918070100.1387082-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

This reverts commit 742e449ddca435897eec6d9c21d4d2573b77242d.

This change is not needed anymore as next patch is changing this to
use pm_runtime_suspended() instead of custom suspended boolean.

Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
---
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    | 23 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index c257542d269d..068dc223653d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -216,10 +216,8 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
 	bool is_enabled;
 
-#ifdef I915
 	if (dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended)
 		return false;
-#endif
 
 	is_enabled = true;
 
@@ -638,6 +636,7 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
 		container_of(power_domains, struct drm_i915_private,
 			     display.power.domains);
+	struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm = &dev_priv->runtime_pm;
 	enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
 	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
 
@@ -646,8 +645,8 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
 	 * wakeref to make the state checker happy about the HW access during
 	 * power well disabling.
 	 */
-	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
-	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
+	assert_rpm_raw_wakeref_held(rpm);
+	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(rpm);
 
 	for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
 		/* Clear before put, so put's sanity check is happy. */
@@ -655,7 +654,7 @@ release_async_put_domains(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains,
 		__intel_display_power_put_domain(dev_priv, domain);
 	}
 
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(rpm, wakeref);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -665,7 +664,8 @@ intel_display_power_put_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		container_of(work, struct drm_i915_private,
 			     display.power.domains.async_put_work.work);
 	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->display.power.domains;
-	intel_wakeref_t new_work_wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_raw(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
+	struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm = &dev_priv->runtime_pm;
+	intel_wakeref_t new_work_wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_raw(rpm);
 	intel_wakeref_t old_work_wakeref = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
@@ -706,9 +706,9 @@ intel_display_power_put_async_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
 
 	if (old_work_wakeref)
-		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, old_work_wakeref);
+		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(rpm, old_work_wakeref);
 	if (new_work_wakeref)
-		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, new_work_wakeref);
+		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(rpm, new_work_wakeref);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ void __intel_display_power_put_async(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 				     int delay_ms)
 {
 	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &i915->display.power.domains;
-	intel_wakeref_t work_wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_raw(&i915->runtime_pm);
+	struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm = &i915->runtime_pm;
+	intel_wakeref_t work_wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get_raw(rpm);
 
 	delay_ms = delay_ms >= 0 ? delay_ms : 100;
 
@@ -762,9 +763,9 @@ void __intel_display_power_put_async(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
 
 	if (work_wakeref)
-		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(&i915->runtime_pm, work_wakeref);
+		intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(rpm, work_wakeref);
 
-	intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(rpm, wakeref);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-18  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-18  7:00 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 0/4] Xe runtime pm refactoring Jouni Högander
2023-09-18  7:00 ` Jouni Högander [this message]
2023-09-18 21:20   ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "FIXME: drm/i915: runtime pm changes" Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-18  7:00 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Remove runtime suspended boolean from intel_runtime_pm struct Jouni Högander
2023-09-18 21:21   ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-18  7:00 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/4] fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs Jouni Högander
2023-09-18 21:22   ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-20 20:02   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-21 11:15     ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-09-18  7:01 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/4] fixup! drm/xe/display: Implement display support Jouni Högander
2023-09-18 21:22   ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2023-09-18  7:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Xe runtime pm refactoring Patchwork
2023-09-18  7:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-18  7:29 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-09-18  7:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-09-18  7:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-18  7:38 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-09-18  8:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230918070100.1387082-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox