From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, sarah.walker@imgtec.com,
ketil.johnsen@arm.com, lina@asahilina.net, mcanal@igalia.com,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, luben.tuikov@amd.com,
dakr@redhat.com, donald.robson@imgtec.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com, faith.ekstrand@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:22:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231023162216.132adc58@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTZ7BR5/QDbgnNwi@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:54:13 +0000
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:39:37PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:16:06 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:09:56 -0700
> > > Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
> > > > + container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_run_job);
> > > > + struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
> > > > + struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > > + struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
> > > > + struct drm_sched_job *sched_job;
> > > > + int r;
> > > >
> > > > - atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
> > > > - drm_sched_job_begin(sched_job);
> > > > + if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched, true);
> > > > + if (!entity)
> > > > + return;
> > > >
> > > > - trace_drm_run_job(sched_job, entity);
> > > > - fence = sched->ops->run_job(sched_job);
> > > > + sched_job = drm_sched_entity_pop_job(entity);
> > > > + if (!sched_job) {
> > > > complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
> > > > - drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence, fence);
> > > > + return; /* No more work */
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
> > > > - /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
> > > > - dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > > + s_fence = sched_job->s_fence;
> > > >
> > > > - r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
> > > > - drm_sched_job_done_cb);
> > > > - if (r == -ENOENT)
> > > > - drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, fence->error);
> > > > - else if (r)
> > > > - DRM_DEV_ERROR(sched->dev, "fence add callback failed (%d)\n",
> > > > - r);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, IS_ERR(fence) ?
> > > > - PTR_ERR(fence) : 0);
> > > > - }
> > > > + atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
> > > > + drm_sched_job_begin(sched_job);
> > > >
> > > > - wake_up(&sched->job_scheduled);
> > > > + trace_drm_run_job(sched_job, entity);
> > > > + fence = sched->ops->run_job(sched_job);
> > > > + complete_all(&entity->entity_idle);
> > > > + drm_sched_fence_scheduled(s_fence, fence);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
> > > > + /* Drop for original kref_init of the fence */
> > > > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > > +
> > > > + r = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &sched_job->cb,
> > > > + drm_sched_job_done_cb);
> > > > + if (r == -ENOENT)
> > > > + drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, fence->error);
> > > > + else if (r)
> > > > + DRM_DEV_ERROR(sched->dev, "fence add callback failed (%d)\n", r);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + drm_sched_job_done(sched_job, IS_ERR(fence) ?
> > > > + PTR_ERR(fence) : 0);
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Just ran into a race condition when using a non-ordered workqueue
> > > for drm_sched:
> > >
> > > thread A thread B
> > >
> > > drm_sched_run_job_work()
> > > drm_sched_job_begin()
> > > // inserts jobA in pending_list
> > >
> > > drm_sched_free_job_work()
> > > drm_sched_get_cleanup_job()
> > > // check first job in pending list
> > > // if s_fence->parent == NULL, consider
> > > // for cleanup
> > > ->free_job(jobA)
> > > drm_sched_job_cleanup()
> > > // set sched_job->s_fence = NULL
> > >
> > > ->run_job()
> > > drm_sched_fence_scheduled()
> >
> > Correction: the NULL pointer deref happens in drm_sched_job_done()
> > (when the driver returns an error directly) not in
> > drm_sched_fence_scheduled(), but the problem remains the same.
> >
> >
>
> Trying to understand this. I don't see how drm_sched_get_cleanup_job can
> return a job until dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished) is
> true. That fence is no signaled until drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence,
> result); called in drm_sched_job_done().
>
> What am I missing here?
Uh, my bad. I was trying to backport panthor (and all its deps) to a 6.1
kernel, and the condition in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() is different
there:
if (job && (!job->s_fence->parent ||
dma_fence_is_signaled(job->s_fence->parent))) {
// pick this job for cleanup
}
Sorry for the noise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 15:09 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/7] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Matthew Brost
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_wqueue_* helpers Matthew Brost
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a work queue rather than kthread Matthew Brost
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/sched: Move schedule policy to scheduler Matthew Brost
2023-10-24 3:34 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/sched: Add DRM_SCHED_POLICY_SINGLE_ENTITY scheduling policy Matthew Brost
2023-10-24 3:50 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-25 15:13 ` Matthew Brost
2023-10-25 18:39 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item Matthew Brost
2023-10-19 1:25 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-19 16:55 ` Matthew Brost
2023-10-22 1:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-23 12:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-23 12:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-23 13:54 ` Matthew Brost
2023-10-23 14:22 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2023-10-23 22:03 ` Matthew Brost
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/sched: Add drm_sched_start_timeout_unlocked helper Matthew Brost
2023-10-17 15:09 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/sched: Add a helper to queue TDR immediately Matthew Brost
2023-10-18 16:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-17 15:12 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for DRM scheduler changes for Xe (rev8) Patchwork
2023-10-18 8:24 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v6 0/7] DRM scheduler changes for Xe Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231023162216.132adc58@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=donald.robson@imgtec.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ketil.johnsen@arm.com \
--cc=lina@asahilina.net \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sarah.walker@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox