From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Luben Tuikov" <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/13] drm/sched: Fix bounds limiting when given a malformed entity
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:27:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208202723.918082-9-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208202723.918082-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
From: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
If we're given a malformed entity in drm_sched_entity_init()--shouldn't
happen, but we verify--with out-of-bounds priority value, we set it to an
allowed value. Fix the expression which sets this limit.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
Fixes: 56e449603f0ac5 ("drm/sched: Convert the GPU scheduler to variable number of run-queues")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231123122422.167832-2-ltuikov89@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dbb91dbe-ef77-4d79-aaf9-2adb171c1d7a@amd.com
(cherry picked from commit 2bbe6ab2be53858507f11f99f856846d04765ae3)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 4d42b1e4daa6..ee645d38e98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -81,12 +81,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
*/
pr_warn("%s: called with uninitialized scheduler\n", __func__);
} else if (num_sched_list) {
- /* The "priority" of an entity cannot exceed the number
- * of run-queues of a scheduler.
+ /* The "priority" of an entity cannot exceed the number of run-queues of a
+ * scheduler. Protect against num_rqs being 0, by converting to signed.
*/
- if (entity->priority >= sched_list[0]->num_rqs)
- entity->priority = max_t(u32, sched_list[0]->num_rqs,
- DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN);
+ if (entity->priority >= sched_list[0]->num_rqs) {
+ drm_err(sched_list[0], "entity with out-of-bounds priority:%u num_rqs:%u\n",
+ entity->priority, sched_list[0]->num_rqs);
+ entity->priority = max_t(s32, (s32) sched_list[0]->num_rqs - 1,
+ (s32) DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN);
+ }
entity->rq = sched_list[0]->sched_rq[entity->priority];
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 20:27 [PATCH 01/13] drm/sched: Rename drm_sched_get_cleanup_job to be more descriptive Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/sched: Move free worker re-queuing out of the if block Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/sched: Rename drm_sched_free_job_queue to be more descriptive Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/sched: Rename drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready and clarify kerneldoc Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/sched: Drop suffix from drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/sched: Don't disturb the entity when in RR-mode scheduling Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/sched: Qualify drm_sched_wakeup() by drm_sched_entity_is_ready() Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/sched: Rename priority MIN to LOW Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/sched: Reverse run-queue priority enumeration Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/sched: Partial revert of "Qualify drm_sched_wakeup() by drm_sched_entity_is_ready()" Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 20:27 ` [PATCH 13/13] fixup! drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-08 22:53 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [01/13] drm/sched: Rename drm_sched_get_cleanup_job to be more descriptive Patchwork
2023-12-08 22:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-12-08 22:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-12-08 23:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-12-08 23:02 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-12-08 23:03 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-12-08 23:42 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-11 19:12 [PATCH 01/13] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-11 19:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/sched: Fix bounds limiting when given a malformed entity Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-12 0:10 [PATCH 01/13] drm/sched: Rename drm_sched_get_cleanup_job to be more descriptive Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-12 0:10 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/sched: Fix bounds limiting when given a malformed entity Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231208202723.918082-9-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox