From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Replace dma_buf mem_access per direct xe_pm_runtime calls
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:39:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222163937.138342-8-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222163937.138342-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Continue on the path to entirely remove mem_access helpers in
favour of the direct xe_pm_runtime calls. This item is one of
the direct outer bounds of the protection.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
index da2627ed6ae7..5b26af21e029 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include "tests/xe_test.h"
#include "xe_bo.h"
#include "xe_device.h"
+#include "xe_pm.h"
#include "xe_ttm_vram_mgr.h"
#include "xe_vm.h"
@@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ static int xe_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
if (!attach->peer2peer && !xe_bo_can_migrate(gem_to_xe_bo(obj), XE_PL_TT))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- xe_device_mem_access_get(to_xe_device(obj->dev));
+ xe_pm_runtime_get(to_xe_device(obj->dev));
return 0;
}
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ static void xe_dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
{
struct drm_gem_object *obj = attach->dmabuf->priv;
- xe_device_mem_access_put(to_xe_device(obj->dev));
+ xe_pm_runtime_put(to_xe_device(obj->dev));
}
static int xe_dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 16:39 [PATCH 01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/xe: Convert mem_access assertion towards the runtime_pm state Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every IOCTL Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/xe: Convert kunit tests from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:56 ` Matthew Auld
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every sysfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/xe: Remove mem_access from guc_pc calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/xe: Runtime PM wake on every debugfs call Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/xe: Convert hwmon from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access protection for query ioctls Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/xe: Convert gsc_work from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/xe: Remove mem_access from suspend and resume functions Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/xe: Convert gt_reset from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/xe: Remove useless mem_access on PAT dumps Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-22 16:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [01/14] drm/xe: Document Xe PM component Patchwork
2024-02-22 16:46 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 16:47 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 16:57 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 16:59 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 17:01 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-02-22 17:20 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-02-25 9:08 ` [PATCH 01/14] " Gupta, Anshuman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-15 19:34 Rodrigo Vivi
2024-02-15 19:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Replace dma_buf mem_access per direct xe_pm_runtime calls Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222163937.138342-8-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox