From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [CI 4/5] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:20:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240426092053.2863-4-nirmoy.das@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426092053.2863-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>
A new helper function xe_bo_has_single_placement() to check
if a BO has single placement.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index bc1f794e3e61..37df8c5aa707 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -95,6 +95,20 @@ bool xe_bo_is_stolen(struct xe_bo *bo)
return bo->ttm.resource->mem_type == XE_PL_STOLEN;
}
+/**
+ * xe_bo_has_single_placement - check if BO is placed only in one memory location
+ * @bo: The BO
+ *
+ * This function checks whether a given BO is placed in only one memory location.
+ *
+ * Returns: true if the BO is placed in a single memory location, false otherwise.
+ *
+ */
+bool xe_bo_has_single_placement(struct xe_bo *bo)
+{
+ return bo->placement.num_placement == 1;
+}
+
/**
* xe_bo_is_stolen_devmem - check if BO is of stolen type accessed via PCI BAR
* @bo: The BO
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
index a885b14bf595..6de894c728f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ bool mem_type_is_vram(u32 mem_type);
bool xe_bo_is_vram(struct xe_bo *bo);
bool xe_bo_is_stolen(struct xe_bo *bo);
bool xe_bo_is_stolen_devmem(struct xe_bo *bo);
+bool xe_bo_has_single_placement(struct xe_bo *bo);
uint64_t vram_region_gpu_offset(struct ttm_resource *res);
bool xe_bo_can_migrate(struct xe_bo *bo, u32 mem_type);
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 9:20 [CI 1/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 9:20 ` [CI 2/5] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 9:20 ` [CI 3/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 9:20 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-04-26 9:20 ` [CI 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:03 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:05 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:17 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:19 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:21 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 10:56 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240426092053.2863-4-nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox