From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init helper
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:50:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240719165012.1512428-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719165012.1512428-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Other layers should not be touching struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence
directly, add helper for initialization.
v2:
- Add dma_fence_get and list init to xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h | 3 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 26 +--------------
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
index d9359976ab8b..92a18a0e4acd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
@@ -508,3 +508,39 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
return 0;
}
+
+static const char *
+invalidation_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *dma_fence)
+{
+ return "xe";
+}
+
+static const char *
+invalidation_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *dma_fence)
+{
+ return "invalidation_fence";
+}
+
+static const struct dma_fence_ops invalidation_fence_ops = {
+ .get_driver_name = invalidation_fence_get_driver_name,
+ .get_timeline_name = invalidation_fence_get_timeline_name,
+};
+
+/**
+ * xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init - Initialize TLB invalidation fence
+ * @gt: GT
+ * @fence: TLB invalidation fence to initialize
+ *
+ * Initialize TLB invalidation fence for use
+ */
+void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,
+ struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(>->tlb_invalidation.lock);
+ dma_fence_init(&fence->base, &invalidation_fence_ops,
+ >->tlb_invalidation.lock,
+ dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1);
+ spin_unlock_irq(>->tlb_invalidation.lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fence->link);
+ dma_fence_get(&fence->base);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
index bf3bebd9f985..948f4a2f5214 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
@@ -26,4 +26,7 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_range(struct xe_gt *gt,
int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait(struct xe_gt *gt, int seqno);
int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len);
+void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,
+ struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence);
+
#endif /* _XE_GT_TLB_INVALIDATION_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
index f391de908033..1caa99b22c73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
@@ -1317,23 +1317,6 @@ struct invalidation_fence {
u32 asid;
};
-static const char *
-invalidation_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *dma_fence)
-{
- return "xe";
-}
-
-static const char *
-invalidation_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *dma_fence)
-{
- return "invalidation_fence";
-}
-
-static const struct dma_fence_ops invalidation_fence_ops = {
- .get_driver_name = invalidation_fence_get_driver_name,
- .get_timeline_name = invalidation_fence_get_timeline_name,
-};
-
static void invalidation_fence_cb(struct dma_fence *fence,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
{
@@ -1372,15 +1355,8 @@ static void invalidation_fence_init(struct xe_gt *gt,
trace_xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_create(gt_to_xe(gt), &ifence->base);
- spin_lock_irq(>->tlb_invalidation.lock);
- dma_fence_init(&ifence->base.base, &invalidation_fence_ops,
- >->tlb_invalidation.lock,
- dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1);
- spin_unlock_irq(>->tlb_invalidation.lock);
-
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ifence->base.link);
+ xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init(gt, &ifence->base);
- dma_fence_get(&ifence->base.base); /* Ref for caller */
ifence->fence = fence;
ifence->gt = gt;
ifence->start = start;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 16:50 [PATCH v5 0/4] Keep device awake TLB invalidations and G2H in flight Matthew Brost
2024-07-19 16:50 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/xe: Drop xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait Matthew Brost
2024-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/xe: Hold a PM ref when GT TLB invalidations are inflight Matthew Brost
2024-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/xe: Build PM into GuC CT layer Matthew Brost
2024-07-19 16:54 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Keep device awake TLB invalidations and G2H in flight (rev2) Patchwork
2024-07-19 16:55 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-07-19 16:55 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240719165012.1512428-2-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox