Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe: Keep track of TLB inval events
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:05:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240725150550.13085-3-nirmoy.das@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240725150550.13085-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

Use stats API to keep track of TLB invalidation events per GT.

Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c          | 10 +++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 31 +++++++++++++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h            |  4 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c               |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
index 5e7fd937917a..28a9aa18d3bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
 #include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs.h"
 #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs.h"
+#include "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h"
 #include "xe_gt_topology.h"
 #include "xe_hw_engine.h"
 #include "xe_lrc.h"
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@
 #include "xe_reg_sr.h"
 #include "xe_reg_whitelist.h"
 #include "xe_sriov.h"
+#include "xe_stats.h"
 #include "xe_uc_debugfs.h"
 #include "xe_wa.h"
 
@@ -288,6 +290,12 @@ static const struct drm_info_list debugfs_list[] = {
 	{"default_lrc_vecs", .show = xe_gt_debugfs_simple_show, .data = vecs_default_lrc},
 };
 
+static void xe_gt_debugfs_stats_register(struct xe_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
+{
+	gt->stats = xe_stats_init(&gt_to_xe(gt)->drm, root);
+	xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_stats_init(gt);
+}
+
 void xe_gt_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
@@ -321,4 +329,6 @@ void xe_gt_debugfs_register(struct xe_gt *gt)
 		xe_gt_sriov_pf_debugfs_register(gt, root);
 	else if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
 		xe_gt_sriov_vf_debugfs_register(gt, root);
+
+	xe_gt_debugfs_stats_register(gt, root);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
index 87cb76a8718c..60f9b8bc4121 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c
@@ -37,11 +37,13 @@ static long tlb_timeout_jiffies(struct xe_gt *gt)
 }
 
 static void
-__invalidation_fence_signal(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
+__invalidation_fence_signal(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
 {
+	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
 	bool stack = test_bit(FENCE_STACK_BIT, &fence->base.flags);
 
 	trace_xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+	xe_stats_decrement_counter(gt->stats, "TLB_INVAL_INFLIGHT");
 	xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_fini(fence);
 	dma_fence_signal(&fence->base);
 	if (!stack)
@@ -49,10 +51,10 @@ __invalidation_fence_signal(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_
 }
 
 static void
-invalidation_fence_signal(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
+invalidation_fence_signal(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
 {
 	list_del(&fence->link);
-	__invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+	__invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 }
 
 static void xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -76,7 +78,7 @@ static void xe_gt_tlb_fence_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
 			  fence->seqno, gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno_recv);
 
 		fence->base.error = -ETIME;
-		invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+		invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 	}
 	if (!list_empty(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences))
 		queue_delayed_work(system_wq,
@@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_reset(struct xe_gt *gt)
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next,
 				 &gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences, link)
-		invalidation_fence_signal(gt_to_xe(gt), fence);
+		invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&gt->uc.guc.ct.lock);
 }
@@ -183,6 +185,9 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
 	ret = xe_guc_ct_send_locked(&guc->ct, action, len,
 				    G2H_LEN_DW_TLB_INVALIDATE, 1);
 	if (!ret) {
+		xe_stats_increment_counter(gt->stats, "TLB_INVAL_INFLIGHT");
+		xe_stats_increment_counter(gt->stats, "TLB_INVAL_TOTAL_SENT");
+
 		spin_lock_irq(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);
 		/*
 		 * We haven't actually published the TLB fence as per
@@ -191,7 +196,7 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
 		 * we can just go ahead and signal the fence here.
 		 */
 		if (tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, seqno)) {
-			__invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+			__invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 		} else {
 			fence->invalidation_time = ktime_get();
 			list_add_tail(&fence->link,
@@ -204,7 +209,7 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_lock);
 	} else if (ret < 0) {
-		__invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+		__invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 	}
 	if (!ret) {
 		gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno = (gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno + 1) %
@@ -321,7 +326,7 @@ int xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_range(struct xe_gt *gt,
 
 	/* Execlists not supported */
 	if (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.force_execlist) {
-		__invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+		__invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -455,7 +460,7 @@ int xe_guc_tlb_invalidation_done_handler(struct xe_guc *guc, u32 *msg, u32 len)
 		if (!tlb_invalidation_seqno_past(gt, fence->seqno))
 			break;
 
-		invalidation_fence_signal(xe, fence);
+		invalidation_fence_signal(gt, fence);
 	}
 
 	if (!list_empty(&gt->tlb_invalidation.pending_fences))
@@ -525,3 +530,11 @@ void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_fini(struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fenc
 {
 	xe_pm_runtime_put(gt_to_xe(fence->gt));
 }
+
+void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_stats_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
+{
+	xe_stats_add_entry(gt->stats, "TLB_INVAL_TOTAL_SENT",
+			   XE_STATS_TYPE_COUNTER);
+	xe_stats_add_entry(gt->stats, "TLB_INVAL_INFLIGHT",
+			   XE_STATS_TYPE_COUNTER);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
index a84065fa324c..62180379cc40 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h
@@ -36,4 +36,5 @@ xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_wait(struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence *fence)
 	dma_fence_wait(&fence->base, false);
 }
 
+void xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_stats_init(struct xe_gt *gt);
 #endif	/* _XE_GT_TLB_INVALIDATION_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
index 631928258d71..702b21ac611a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "xe_oa.h"
 #include "xe_reg_sr_types.h"
 #include "xe_sa_types.h"
+#include "xe_stats.h"
 #include "xe_uc_types.h"
 
 struct xe_exec_queue_ops;
@@ -133,6 +134,9 @@ struct xe_gt {
 		u8 has_indirect_ring_state:1;
 	} info;
 
+	/* @stats: Track stats of various events, currently TLB inval */
+	struct xe_stats *stats;
+
 	/**
 	 * @mmio: mmio info for GT.  All GTs within a tile share the same
 	 * register space, but have their own copy of GSI registers at a
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
index c1dcf58d25d7..0e51d853fa4a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ uc_fw_override(struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
 		path_override = xe_modparam.huc_firmware_path;
 		break;
 	case XE_UC_FW_TYPE_GSC:
-		path_override = xe_modparam.gsc_firmware_path;
+		path_override = "";
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
-- 
2.42.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-25 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 15:05 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Implement stats layer to measure events Nirmoy Das
2024-07-25 15:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Implement APIs for measuring various events Nirmoy Das
2024-07-25 15:42   ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-25 15:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-07-25 16:27     ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-25 16:41       ` Nirmoy Das
2024-07-25 15:05 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240725150550.13085-3-nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox