Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] drm/xe/tests: Add KUnit tests for VF control GuC messages
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2024 18:51:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809165159.662-13-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809165159.662-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

Add KUnit tests (~50) to cover all possible VF control messages
that could be seen by the PF, either expected or corrupted.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 .../xe/tests/xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_kunit.c   | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 194 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_kunit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_kunit.c
index 4252577b4bbd..194fcf5687d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_kunit.c
@@ -1358,3 +1358,197 @@ static struct kunit_suite pf_control_suite = {
 };
 
 kunit_test_suite(pf_control_suite);
+
+#define PREP_MSG_0_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(mbz)							\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC) |			\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT) |			\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_DATA0, (mbz)) |				\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION, GUC_ACTION_GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY)
+
+#define PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(mbz, vfid, e)						\
+	PREP_MSG_0_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(mbz),						\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_1_VFID, (vfid)),		\
+	FIELD_PREP_CONST(GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_2_EVENT, (e))
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_enable[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, 0, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_ENABLE),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_flr[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_flr_done[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR_DONE),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_pause_done[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_PAUSE_DONE),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_fixup[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FIXUP_DONE),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_bad_mbz[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(1, 0, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_ENABLE),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_invalid_event[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, 0, 0),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_unknown_event[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, 0, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_ENABLE + 1),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_bad_mbz[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(1, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_bad_vfid[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFID(DUT_NUM_VFS + 1), GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_invalid_event[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, 0),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_unknown_event[] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FIXUP_DONE + 1),
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_no_data[GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_MIN_LEN] = {
+	PREP_MSG_0_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0),
+	/* only header, missing both VFID and EVENT data */
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_too_short[GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_LEN - 1] = {
+	PREP_MSG_0_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0),
+	PFID,
+	/* missing EVENT data */
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_pf_too_long[GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_LEN + 1] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, 0, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_ENABLE),
+	0, /* unexpected extra DATA */
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_too_short[GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_LEN - 1] = {
+	PREP_MSG_0_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0),
+	VFUT1,
+	/* missing EVENT data */
+};
+
+static const u32 msg_vf_too_long[GUC2PF_VF_STATE_NOTIFY_EVENT_MSG_LEN + 1] = {
+	PREP_MSG_VF_STATE_NOTIFY(0, VFUT1, GUC_PF_NOTIFY_VF_FLR),
+	0, /* unexpected extra DATA */
+};
+
+struct msg_param {
+	const char *name;
+	const u32 *msg;
+	size_t len;
+};
+
+static void msg_param_get_desc(struct msg_param *p, char *desc)
+{
+	snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE, "%s", p->name);
+}
+
+#define MAKE_MSG_PARAM(X) { .name = #X, .msg = X, .len = ARRAY_SIZE(X) }
+
+#define LIST_MSG_PARAM_VALID			\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_enable),		\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_flr),		\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_flr_done),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_pause_done),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_fixup)
+
+#define LIST_MSG_PARAM_INVALID			\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_no_data),		\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_too_long),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_too_short),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_bad_mbz),		\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_invalid_event),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_pf_unknown_event),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_too_long),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_too_short),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_bad_mbz),		\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_bad_vfid),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_invalid_event),	\
+	MAKE_MSG_PARAM(msg_vf_unknown_event)
+
+static struct msg_param valid_messages[] = {
+	LIST_MSG_PARAM_VALID,
+};
+
+static struct msg_param invalid_messages[] = {
+	LIST_MSG_PARAM_INVALID,
+};
+
+static struct msg_param all_messages[] = {
+	LIST_MSG_PARAM_VALID,
+	LIST_MSG_PARAM_INVALID,
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(valid_messages, valid_messages, msg_param_get_desc);
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(invalid_messages, invalid_messages, msg_param_get_desc);
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(all_messages, all_messages, msg_param_get_desc);
+
+static void xe_rejects_all_g2h(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct xe_device *xe = (xe_kunit_helper_xe_device_test_init(test), test->priv);
+	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
+	const struct msg_param *p = test->param_value;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, IS_SRIOV_PF(xe));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EPROTO, xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_process_guc2pf(gt, p->msg, p->len));
+}
+
+static void vf_rejects_all_g2h(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct xe_device *xe = (xe_kunit_helper_xe_device_test_init(test), test->priv);
+	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, 0);
+	const struct msg_param *p = test->param_value;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, IS_SRIOV(xe));
+	xe->sriov.__mode = XE_SRIOV_MODE_VF;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, IS_SRIOV_VF(xe));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EPROTO, xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_process_guc2pf(gt, p->msg, p->len));
+}
+
+static void pf_rejects_malformed_g2h(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct xe_gt *gt = (pf_control_test_init(test), test->priv);
+	const struct msg_param *p = test->param_value;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_process_guc2pf(gt, p->msg, p->len));
+}
+
+static void pf_accepts_valid_g2h(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct xe_gt *gt = (pf_control_test_init(test), test->priv);
+	const struct msg_param *p = test->param_value;
+
+	XE_TEST_ACTIVATE_STUB(test, gt->sriov.pf.control.send_vf_control_cmd,
+			      send_vf_control_cmd_pass_no_reply);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, xe_gt_sriov_pf_control_process_guc2pf(gt, p->msg, p->len));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case pf_control_guc_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rejects_all_g2h, all_messages_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(vf_rejects_all_g2h, all_messages_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(pf_rejects_malformed_g2h, invalid_messages_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(pf_accepts_valid_g2h, valid_messages_gen_params),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite pf_control_guc_suite = {
+	.name = "pf_control_guc",
+	.test_cases = pf_control_guc_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(pf_control_guc_suite);
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09 16:51 [PATCH 00/12] PF: Improve VF control Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe/pf: Add function to sanitize VF resources Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-16 12:58   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-19 20:47   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-20  9:38     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-20 13:16       ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-09-05 18:07         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/xe/pf: Fix documentation formatting Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-16 12:59   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/xe/pf: Drop GuC notifications for non-existing VF Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-16 13:01   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-19 17:51     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-22 10:48       ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/xe/pf: Improve VF control Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-16 13:06   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-19 17:52     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-20  7:56   ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-20 10:04     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/xe/tests: Allow deferred function call during KUnit test Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-19 21:38   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-20 10:23     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-20 13:21       ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-20 13:27       ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/xe/tests: Add helper macro to detect if KUnit is running Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/xe/tests: Add helpers to call stubs out of KUnit context Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-19 21:52   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-20 10:31     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/xe/guc: Define stub for xe_guc_ct_send_recv() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe/pf: Define stub for pf_sanitize_vf_resources() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/xe/pf: Define stub for pf_send_vf_control_cmd() Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/xe/tests: Add KUnit tests for VF control state machines Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-09 17:23   ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-08-22 10:51     ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-22 10:47   ` [PATCH " Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-09 16:51 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-08-23 13:18   ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/xe/tests: Add KUnit tests for VF control GuC messages Piotr Piórkowski
2024-08-09 16:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PF: Improve VF control Patchwork
2024-08-09 16:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-09 16:58 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for PF: Improve VF control (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:29 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:30 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:42 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:44 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-09 17:46 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-08-09 18:06 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-08-09 20:35 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240809165159.662-13-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox