From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] uC-related drmm vs devm fixes
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:12:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809231237.1503796-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> (raw)
If HW access is required for cleaning up a resource, we need to use devm
callbacks instead of drmm ones, otherwise the HW might already be gone
by the time the cleanup function is called.
The first patch in the series fixes the managed_bo callback, which is
not uC-specific but it is used to clean up the uC objects. The second
and third patch fix cleanup of BOs and exec_queues in uC code.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (3):
drm/xe: use devm instead of drmm for managed bo
drm/xe/uc: Use managed bo for HuC and GSC objects
drm/xe/uc: Use devm to register cleanup that includes exec_queues
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 6 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c | 16 +++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c | 36 +++++-------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c | 19 +++++-----------
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 23:12 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2024-08-09 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: use devm instead of drmm for managed bo Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-10 4:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-12 10:41 ` Matthew Auld
2024-08-12 16:38 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-12 18:17 ` Matthew Auld
2024-08-12 18:43 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-09 23:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/uc: Use managed bo for HuC and GSC objects Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-15 20:00 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-08-15 20:44 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-09 23:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe/uc: Use devm to register cleanup that includes exec_queues Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2024-08-09 23:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] uC-related drmm vs devm fixes Matthew Brost
2024-08-10 0:06 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:06 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:07 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:24 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:29 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:31 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-08-10 0:52 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-10 3:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240809231237.1503796-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox